ArticleJAMA pediatrics2016
Epidemiological and Economic Effects of Priming With the Whole-Cell Bordetella pertussis Vaccine.
Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- A Sensitive Public Health Issue-The Vaccine Acceptancy and the Anti-Pertussis Immune Status of Pregnant Women from a Romanian Metropolitan Area.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Evaluation of Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccines in the Context of Long-Term Herd Immunity.Vaccines · 2022Review
- Vaccine-Induced Cellular Immunity againstVaccines · 2021Review
- Article
- Th1/Th17 polarization persists following whole-cell pertussis vaccination despite repeated acellular boosters.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2018Article
- Whole-Cell or Acellular Pertussis Primary Immunizations in Infancy Determines Adolescent Cellular Immune Profiles.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- Adverse events following primary and secondary immunisation with whole-cell pertussis: a systematic review protocol.BMJ open · 2017Article
- Effectiveness of pertussis vaccination and duration of immunity.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
importanceCurrent acellular pertussis vaccines may not protect against transmission of Bordetella pertussis.
objectiveTo assess whether a priming dose of whole-cell pertussis (wP) vaccine is cost-effective at reducing pertussis infection in infants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND
participantsMathematical model of pertussis transmission fit to US incidence data in a simulation of the US population. In this simulation study conducted from June 2014 to May 2015, the population was divided into 9 age groups corresponding to the current pertussis vaccination schedule and fit to 2012 pertussis incidence.
interventionsInclusion of a priming dose of wP vaccine into the current acellular pertussis vaccination schedule. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Reductions in symptomatic pertussis incidence by age group, increases in wP vaccine-related adverse effects, and quality-adjusted life-years owing to changing vaccine schedule.
resultsSwitching to a wP-priming vaccination strategy could reduce whooping cough incidence by up to 95% (95% CI, 91-98), including 96% (95% CI, 92-98) fewer infections in neonates. Although there may be an increase in the number of vaccine adverse effects, we nonetheless estimate a 95% reduction in quality-adjusted life-years lost with a switch to the combined strategy and a cost reduction of 94% (95% CI, 91-97), saving more than $142 million annually. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our results suggest that an alternative vaccination schedule including 1 dose of wP vaccine may be highly cost-effective and ethically preferred until next-generation pertussis vaccines become available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.