Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27018772›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2017

Involving self-help groups in health-care institutions: the patients' contribution to and their view of 'self-help friendliness' as an approach to implement quality criteria of sustainable co-operation.

Stefan Nickel, Alf Trojan, Christopher Kofahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Self-Help-Friendly Hospitals: Integrating Self-Help Groups as a Complementary Service in Healthcare.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prospective analysis of the attendance behaviour of the participants of a facilitated support group for patients after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  6. Self-help friendliness in cancer care: A cross-sectional study among self-help group leaders in Germany.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Involving Latina/o parents in patient-centered outcomes research: Contributions to research study design, implementation and outcomes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefan NickelDepartment of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Alf TrojanDepartment of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.
Christopher KofahlDepartment of Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe importance of patient participation and involvement is now widely acknowledged; in the past, few systematic health-care institution policies existed to establish sustainable co-operation. In 2004, in Germany, the initiative 'Self-Help Friendliness (SHF) and Patient-Centeredness in Health Care' was launched to establish and implement quality criteria related to collaboration with patient groups.

objectivesThe objective of this study was to describe (i) how patients were involved in the development of SHF by summarizing a number of studies and (ii) a new survey on the importance and feasibility of SHF. SETTING AND

participantsIn a series of participative studies, SHF was shaped, tested and implemented in 40 health-care institutions in Germany. Representatives from 157 self-help groups (SHGs), 50 self-help organizations and 17 self-help clearing houses were actively involved. The second objective was reached through a survey of 74 of the 115 member associations of the biggest self-help umbrella organization at federal level (response rate: 64 %).

resultsPatient involvement included the following: identification of the needs and wishes of SHGs regarding co-operation, their involvement in the definition of quality criteria of co-operation, having a crucial role during the implementation of SHF and accrediting health-care institutions as self-help friendly. The ten criteria in total were positively valued and perceived as moderately practicable.

conclusionsThrough the intensive involvement of self-help representatives, it was feasible to develop SHF as a systematic approach to closer collaboration of professionals and SHGs. Some challenges have to be taken into account involving patients and the limitations of our empirical study.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesPatient ParticipationSelf-Help GroupsCooperative BehaviorFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesco-operationparticipation in health-care institutionspatient involvementquality managementself-help friendlinessself-help groups

Identifiers

PMID27018772
PMCPMC5354032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.