Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27018335›Full record

ArticleNeuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society2016

Tissue Response to Deep Brain Stimulation and Microlesion: A Comparative Study.

Vinata Vedam-Mai, Massoud Baradaran-Shoraka, Brent A Reynolds, Michael S Okun

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Change in brain molecular landscapes following electrical stimulation of the nucleus accumbens.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Microglia and Parkinson's disease: footprints to pathology.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vinata Vedam-MaiDepartment of Neurosurgery, McKnight Brain Institute, University of FL, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Massoud Baradaran-ShorakaDepartment of Neurosurgery, McKnight Brain Institute, University of FL, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Brent A ReynoldsDepartment of Neurosurgery, McKnight Brain Institute, University of FL, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Michael S OkunMovement Disorders & Neurorestoration, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

Mobile Decision Support System for Nurse Management of Neuromodulation TherapyR01NR014852 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BUTSON, CHRISTOPHER R, OKUN, MICHAEL S · 2015 to 2019
$2.9M
NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is used for a variety of movement disorders, including Parkinson's disease. There are several theories regarding the biology and mechanisms of action of DBS. Previously, we observed an up-regulation of neural progenitor cell proliferation in post-mortem tissue suggesting that DBS can influence cellular plasticity in regions beyond the site of stimulation. We wanted to support these observations and investigate the relationship if any, between DBS, neural progenitor cells, and microglia.

methodsWe used naïve rats in this study for DBS electrode implantation, stimulation, and microlesions. We used immunohistochemistry techniques for labeling microglial and progenitor cells, and fluorescence microscopy for viewing and quantification of labeled cells.

resultsWe present data that demonstrates a reciprocal relationship of microglia and neural precursor cells in the presence of acute high frequency stimulation. In our hands, stimulated animals demonstrate significantly lower numbers of activated microglia (p = 0.026) when compared to microlesion and sham animals. The subthalamic region surrounding the DBS stimulating electrode reveals a significant increase in the number of neural precursor cells expressing cell cycle markers, plasticity and precursor cell markers (Ki67; p = 0.0013, MCM2; p = 0.0002).

interpretationWe conclude that in this animal model, acute DBS results in modest local progenitor cell proliferation and influenced the total number of activated microglia. This could be of clinical significance in patients with PD, as it is thought to progress via neuroinflammatory processes involving microglia, cytokines, and the complement system. Further studies are required to comprehend the behavior of microglia in different activation states and their ability to regulate adult neurogenesis under physiologic and pathologic conditions.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainBromodeoxyuridineCalcium-Binding ProteinsCell CountCell ProliferationDeep Brain StimulationGene Expression RegulationKi-67 AntigenMiceMicrofilament ProteinsMicrogliaMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2RatsRats, Sprague-DawleySubthalamic NucleusAif1 protein, ratBromodeoxyuridineCalcium-Binding ProteinsKi-67 AntigenMicrofilament ProteinsMinichromosome Maintenance Complex Component 2Deep brain stimulationmicroglianeural precursor cellParkinson's diseaseplasticity

Identifiers

PMID27018335
PMCPMC4961567

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.