Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27017626›Full record

ArticleGenetics2016

Natural Selection and Genetic Diversity in the Butterfly Heliconius melpomene.

Simon H Martin, Markus Möst, William J Palmer, Camilo Salazar, W Owen McMillan, Francis M Jiggins, Chris D Jiggins

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Testing hypotheses of a coevolutionary key innovation reveals a complex suite of traits involved in defusing the mustard oil bomb.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Simon H MartinDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EH, United Kingdom shm45@cam.ac.uk.
Markus MöstDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EH, United Kingdom.
William J PalmerDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EH, United Kingdom.
Camilo SalazarBiology Program, Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Universidad del Rosario, Bogota 111221, Colombia.
W Owen McMillanSmithsonian Tropical Research Institution, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Ancón, Panama.
Francis M JigginsDepartment of Genetics, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EH, United Kingdom.
Chris D JigginsDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, CB2 3EH, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GBSmithsonian Tropical Research Institute · PAUniversidad del Rosario · CO

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 3774European Research Council 281668
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A combination of selective and neutral evolutionary forces shape patterns of genetic diversity in nature. Among the insects, most previous analyses of the roles of drift and selection in shaping variation across the genome have focused on the genus Drosophila A more complete understanding of these forces will come from analyzing other taxa that differ in population demography and other aspects of biology. We have analyzed diversity and signatures of selection in the neotropical Heliconius butterflies using resequenced genomes from 58 wild-caught individuals of Heliconius melpomene and another 21 resequenced genomes representing 11 related species. By comparing intraspecific diversity and interspecific divergence, we estimate that 31% of amino acid substitutions between Heliconius species are adaptive. Diversity at putatively neutral sites is negatively correlated with the local density of coding sites as well as nonsynonymous substitutions and positively correlated with recombination rate, indicating widespread linked selection. This process also manifests in significantly reduced diversity on longer chromosomes, consistent with lower recombination rates. Although hitchhiking around beneficial nonsynonymous mutations has significantly shaped genetic variation in H. melpomene, evidence for strong selective sweeps is limited overall. We did however identify two regions where distinct haplotypes have swept in different populations, leading to increased population differentiation. On the whole, our study suggests that positive selection is less pervasive in these butterflies as compared to fruit flies, a fact that curiously results in very similar levels of neutral diversity in these very different insects.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, GeneticSelection, GeneticAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsButterfliesChromosomes, InsectRecombination, Geneticbackground selectioneffective population sizegenetic hitchhikingrecombination rateselective sweeps

Identifiers

PMID27017626
PMCPMC4858797
OpenAlexW2305909328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.