Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27017344›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2016

The effect of shunt surgery on neuropsychological performance in normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Katie A Peterson, George Savulich, Dan Jackson, Clare Killikelly, John D Pickard, Barbara J Sahakian

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rehabilitation after diagnosis of hydrocephalus in severe acquired brain injury: the unmet need for evidence-based guidelines.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Development of inattention and executive dysfunction in youth with spina bifida: condition severity variables as predictors.Child neuropsychology : a journal on normal and abnormal development in childhood and adolescence · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Normal pressure hydrocephalus treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katie A PetersonDepartment of Psychiatry, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Level 4 Box 189, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. kap45@medschl.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8217-8918
George SavulichDepartment of Psychiatry, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Level 4 Box 189, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Dan JacksonMRC Biostatistics Unit, Institute of Public Health, Robinson Way, Cambridge, UK.
Clare KillikellyDepartment of Psychiatry, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Level 4 Box 189, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
John D PickardDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Barbara J SahakianDepartment of Psychiatry, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Level 4 Box 189, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
University of Cambridge · GBMRC Biostatistics Unit · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0001237Medical Research Council G0001354Medical Research Council G0600986Medical Research Council G1000183Medical Research Council G9439390Wellcome Trust 093875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of the literature and used meta-analytic techniques to evaluate the impact of shunt surgery on neuropsychological performance in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH). Twenty-three studies with 1059 patients were identified for review using PubMed, Web of Science, Google scholar and manual searching. Inclusion criteria were prospective, within-subject investigations of cognitive outcome using neuropsychological assessment before and after shunt surgery in patients with NPH. There were statistically significant effects of shunt surgery on cognition (Mini-Mental State Examination; MMSE), learning and memory (Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test; RAVLT, total and delayed subtests), executive function (backwards digit span, phonemic verbal fluency, trail making test B) and psychomotor speed (trail making test A) all in the direction of improvement following shunt surgery, but with considerable heterogeneity across all measures. A more detailed examination of the data suggested robust evidence for improved MMSE, RAVLT total, RAVLT delayed, phonemic verbal fluency and trail making test A only. Meta-regressions revealed no statistically significant effect of age, sex or follow-up interval on improvement in the MMSE. Our results suggest that shunt surgery is most sensitive for improving global cognition, learning and memory and psychomotor speed in patients with NPH.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsCognition DisordersDatabases, BibliographicHumansHydrocephalus, Normal PressureNeuropsychological TestsCognitionNeuropsychological testsNeuropsychologyNormal pressure hydrocephalusShunt surgery

Identifiers

PMID27017344
PMCPMC4971036
OpenAlexW2305470624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.