Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27017234›Full record

Trial reportJACC. Cardiovascular imaging2016

Sex Differences in Demographics, Risk Factors, Presentation, and Noninvasive Testing in Stable Outpatients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the PROMISE Trial.

Kshipra Hemal, Neha J Pagidipati, Adrian Coles, Rowena J Dolor, Daniel B Mark, Patricia A Pellikka, Udo Hoffmann, Sheldon E Litwin, Melissa A Daubert, Svati H Shah and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JACC. Cardiovascular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Stable angina in young women.European heart journal · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Kshipra Hemal
Neha J Pagidipati
Adrian Coles
Rowena J Dolor
Daniel B Mark
Patricia A Pellikka
Udo Hoffmann
Sheldon E Litwin
Melissa A Daubert
Svati H Shah
Kevin Ariani
Renée P Bullock-Palmer
Beth Martinez
Kerry L Lee
Pamela S Douglas
Duke University · USDeborah Heart and Lung Center · USHarvard University · USMayo Clinic · USMedical University of South Carolina · USNorthridge Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

PROMISE Trial: Clinical Coordinating CenterR01HL098237 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DOUGLAS, PAMELA SUSAN · 2009 to 2014
$27.3M
Postdoctoral Training in Cardiovascular Clinical ResearchT32HL069749 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2003 to 2023
$6.7M
PROMISE Trial: SDCCR01HL098236 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, KERRY L · 2009 to 2014
$5.0M
Cardiac MR and CT ResearchT32HL076136 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI NEILAN, TOMAS G · 2004 to 2019
$4.9M
PROMISE Trial: Dx CoreR01HL098305 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI HOFFMANN, UDO · 2009 to 2014
$3.5M
PROMISE Trial: EQOL Coordinating CenterR01HL098235 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MARK, DANIEL B · 2009 to 2014
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098235NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098236NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098237NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098305NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL069749NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL076136
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study was to determine whether presentation, risk assessment, testing choices, and results differ by sex in stable symptomatic outpatients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

backgroundAlthough established CAD presentations differ by sex, little is known about stable, suspected CAD.

methodsThe characteristics of 10,003 men and women in the PROMISE (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) trial were compared using chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. Sex differences in test selection and predictors of test positivity were examined using logistic regression.

resultsWomen were older (62.4 years of age vs. 59.0 years of age) and were more likely to be hypertensive (66.6% vs. 63.2%), dyslipidemic (68.9% vs. 66.3%), and to have a family history of premature CAD (34.6% vs. 29.3) (all p values <0.005). Women were less likely to smoke (45.6% vs. 57.0%; p < 0.001), although their prevalence of diabetes was similar to that in men (21.8% vs. 21.0%; p = 0.30). Chest pain was the primary symptom in 73.2% of women versus 72.3% of men (p = 0.30), and was characterized as “crushing/pressure/squeezing/tightness” in 52.5% of women versus 46.2% of men (p < 0.001). Compared with men, all risk scores characterized women as being at lower risk, and providers were more likely to characterize women as having a low (<30%) pre-test probability of CAD (40.7% vs. 34.1%; p < 0.001). Compared with men, women were more often referred to imaging tests (adjusted odds ratio: 1.21; 95% confidence interval: 1.01 to 1.44) than nonimaging tests. Women were less likely to have a positive test (9.7% vs. 15.1%; p < 0.001). Although univariate predictors of test positivity were similar, in multivariable models, age, body mass index, and Framingham risk score were predictive of a positive test in women, whereas Framingham and Diamond and Forrester risk scores were predictive in men.

conclusionsPatient sex influences the entire diagnostic pathway for possible CAD, from baseline risk factors and presentation to noninvasive test outcomes. These differences highlight the need for sex-specific approaches for the evaluation of CAD.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesHeart Function TestsOutpatientsAgedAged, 80 and overAngina PectorisChi-Square DistributionComorbidityCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate Analysis

Identifiers

PMID27017234
PMCPMC4982809
OpenAlexW2307067180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.