Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27017162›Full record

ArticleHPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association2016

Comparison of Modified Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy and pancreaticogastrostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Shin-E Wang, Shih-Chin Chen, Bor-Uei Shyr, Yi-Ming Shyr

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03212196 (Technical Strategies for Pancreatic Fistula Prevention After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in High-risk Pancreatic Remnant), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03212196 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Technical Strategies for Pancreatic Fistula Prevention After Pancreaticoduodenectomy in High-risk Pancreatic Remnant: a Risk-adjusted Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaRan2017 to 2019Enrolled72ConditionsPancreatic FistulaArmsPancreaticogastrostomy with external drain, Pancreaticojejunostomy with transanastomotic drain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in the era of minimally invasive surgery.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shin-E WangDepartment of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Shih-Chin ChenDepartment of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Bor-Uei ShyrDepartment of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Yi-Ming ShyrDepartment of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, National Yang Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC. Electronic address: ymshyr@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to compare perioperative outcomes after Blumgart pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) and pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) for pancreatic-enteric reconstruction following pancreaticoduodenectomy.

methodsData of patients undergoing Blumgart PJ and PG were retrieved from prospectively-collected database. Matched patients in each surgical groups were included based on the Callery risk scoring system for clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) (grades B and C). Surgical parameters and risks were compared between these two groups.

resultsA total of 206 patients undergoing PD were included. Blumgart PJ was associated with shorter postoperative hospital stay (median (range) 25 (10-99) vs. 27 (10-97) days, P = 0.022). There was no surgical mortality in the Blumgart PJ group, but a 4.9% perioperative mortality in the PG, P = 0.030. The CR-POPF by Blumgrt PG is significantly lower than that by PG for overall patients (7% vs. 20%, P = 0.007), especially for those in intermediate fistula risk zone (6% vs. 21%, P =0.048) and high fistula risk zone (14% vs. 47%, P=0.038).

conclusionsBlumgart PJ is superior to PG in terms of pancreatic leakage and surgical mortality. Blumgart PJ can be recommended for pancreatic reconstruction after PD for all pancreatic remnant subtypes.

Indexed as

PancreaticoduodenectomyPancreaticojejunostomyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleGastrostomyHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic FistulaRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27017162
PMCPMC4814607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.