ArticleBioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters2016
Dioxol and dihydrodioxin analogs of 2- and 3-phenylacetonitriles as potent anti-cancer agents with nanomolar activity against a variety of human cancer cells.
Article in Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthesis and Anticancer Evaluation of New Indole-Based Tyrphostin Derivatives and Their (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- New 3-Aryl-2-(2-thienyl)acrylonitriles with High Activity Against Hepatoma Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A small library of (Z)-2-(benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-yl) and (Z)-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxin-6-yl analogs of 2- and 3-phenylacetonitriles has been synthesized and evaluated for their anti-cancer activities against a panel of 60 human cancer cell lines. The dihydrodioxin analog 3j and dioxol analogs 5e and 7e exhibited the most potent anti-cancer activity of all the analogs synthesized in this study, with GI50 values of <100 nM against almost all of the cell lines in the human cancer cell panel. Of these three, only compound 3j inhibited tubulin polymerization to any degree in vitro. The binding modes of 3j and the structurally related tubulin-inhibitor DMU-212 were determined by virtual docking studies with tubulin dimer. Compound 3j docked at the colchicine-binding site at the dimer interface of tubulin. The Full-Fitness (FF) score of 3j was observed to be substantially higher than DMU-212, which agrees well with the observed anti-cancer potency (GI50 values). The mechanism by which dioxol analogs 5e and 7e exert their cytotoxic effects remains unknown at this stage, but it is unlikely that they affect tubulin dynamics. Nevertheless, these findings suggest that both dioxol and dihydrodioxin analogs of phenylacrylonitrile may have potential for development as clinical candidates to treat a variety of human cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.