Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27016942›Full record

ArticleThe protein journal2016

Comparison of Different Protein Extraction Methods for Gel-Based Proteomic Analysis of Ganoderma spp.

Jameel R Al-Obaidi, Noor Baity Saidi, Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad Usuldin, Siti Nahdatul Isnaini Said Hussin, Noornabeela Md Yusoff, Abu Seman Idris

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The protein journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Recovery of Proteases and Protease Inhibitors fromCurrent protein & peptide science · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. An In-Depth Study of PhytopathogenicJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Growth performance ofSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jameel R Al-ObaidiAgro-Biotechnology Institute Malaysia (ABI), c/o MARDI Headquarters, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. jr_alobaidi@yahoo.com.
Noor Baity SaidiDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Siti Rokhiyah Ahmad UsuldinAgro-Biotechnology Institute Malaysia (ABI), c/o MARDI Headquarters, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Siti Nahdatul Isnaini Said HussinAgro-Biotechnology Institute Malaysia (ABI), c/o MARDI Headquarters, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Noornabeela Md YusoffInstitute of Medical Science Technology (MESTECH), Universiti of Kuala Lumpur, 43000, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Abu Seman IdrisMalaysian Palm Oil Board, No. 6, Persiaran Institusi, Bandar Baru Bangi, 43000, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia.
National Institutes of Biotechnology Malaysia · MYMalaysian Agricultural Research and Development Institute · MYMalaysian Palm Oil Board · MYUniversiti Putra Malaysia · MYUniversity of Kuala Lumpur · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ganoderma species are a group of fungi that have the ability to degrade lignin polymers and cause severe diseases such as stem and root rot and can infect economically important plants and perennial crops such as oil palm, especially in tropical countries such as Malaysia. Unfortunately, very little is known about the complex interplay between oil palm and Ganoderma in the pathogenesis of the diseases. Proteomic technologies are simple yet powerful tools in comparing protein profile and have been widely used to study plant-fungus interaction. A critical step to perform a good proteome research is to establish a method that gives the best quality and a wide coverage of total proteins. Despite the availability of various protein extraction protocols from pathogenic fungi in the literature, no single extraction method was found suitable for all types of pathogenic fungi. To develop an optimized protein extraction protocol for 2-DE gel analysis of Ganoderma spp., three previously reported protein extraction protocols were compared: trichloroacetic acid, sucrose and phenol/ammonium acetate in methanol. The third method was found to give the most reproducible gels and highest protein concentration. Using the later method, a total of 10 protein spots (5 from each species) were successfully identified. Hence, the results from this study propose phenol/ammonium acetate in methanol as the most effective protein extraction method for 2-DE proteomic studies of Ganoderma spp.

Indexed as

Electrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelFungal ProteinsGanodermaProteomicsFungal ProteinsBasal stem rotExtraction protocolGanoderma boninenseGanoderma tornatumTwo-dimensional gel electrophoresis

Identifiers

PMID27016942
OpenAlexW2311786842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.