Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27016276›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2017

Quantitative 3D magnetic resonance elastography: Comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis.

Shivaram P Arunachalam, Phillip J Rossman, Arvin Arani, David S Lake, Kevin J Glaser, Joshua D Trzasko, Armando Manduca, Kiaran P McGee, Richard L Ehman, Philip A Araoz

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Anisotropic wear behavior of meniscus: Influence of cross-shear and loading magnitude.Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. MR Elastography: Practical Questions, From theAJR. American journal of roentgenology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Bone architecture, bone material properties, and bone turnover in non-osteoporotic post-menopausal women with fragility fracture.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. MR elastography: Principles, guidelines, and terminology.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shivaram P ArunachalamDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Phillip J RossmanDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Arvin AraniDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
David S LakeDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kevin J GlaserDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Joshua D TrzaskoDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Armando ManducaDepartment of Physiology and Biomedical Engineering, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kiaran P McGeeDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Richard L EhmanDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Philip A AraozDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Magnetic Resonance ElastographyR37EB001981 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI EHMAN, RICHARD L. · 2016 to 2025
$4.0M
Magnetic Resonance ElastographyR01EB001981 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI EHMAN, RICHARD L. · 2003 to 2013
$3.1M
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Elastography: Imaging Heart Failure PathophysiologyR01HL115144 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI ARAOZ, PHILIP ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL115144NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001981NIBIB NIH HHS R37 EB001981
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMagnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is a rapidly growing noninvasive imaging technique for measuring tissue mechanical properties in vivo. Previous studies have compared two-dimensional MRE measurements with material properties from dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA) devices that were limited in frequency range. Advanced DMA technology now allows broad frequency range testing, and three-dimensional (3D) MRE is increasingly common. The purpose of this study was to compare 3D MRE stiffness measurements with those of DMA over a wide range of frequencies and shear stiffnesses.

methods3D MRE and DMA were performed on eight different polyvinyl chloride samples over 20-205 Hz with stiffness between 3 and 23 kPa. Driving frequencies were chosen to create 1.1, 2.2, 3.3, 4.4, 5.5, and 6.6 effective wavelengths across the diameter of the cylindrical phantoms. Wave images were analyzed using direct inversion and local frequency estimation algorithm with the curl operator and compared with DMA measurements at each corresponding frequency. Samples with sufficient spatial resolution and with an octahedral shear strain signal-to-noise ratio > 3 were compared.

resultsConsistency between the two techniques was measured with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and was excellent with an overall ICC of 0.99.

conclusions3D MRE and DMA showed excellent consistency over a wide range of frequencies and stiffnesses. Magn Reson Med 77:1184-1192, 2017. © 2016 The Authors Magnetic Resonance in Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsElasticity Imaging TechniquesElastic ModulusImage EnhancementImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaterials TestingPhantoms, ImagingReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityShear StrengthStress, Mechanicaldynamic mechanical analysisloss modulusmagnetic resonance elastographyshear modulusstorage modulus

Identifiers

PMID27016276
PMCPMC5036985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.