Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27016207›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular biology2016

The Structure Inventory of the Nuclear Pore Complex.

Thomas U Schwartz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Nucleoporin-associated steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Molecular Architecture of the Nuclear Basket.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. An introduction to dynamic nucleoporins inJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Review

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Thomas U SchwartzDepartment of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, 02139, MA, USA.

Funding

High Resolution Assembly Structure of The Nuclear Pore ComplexR01GM077537 · NIGMS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI SCHWARTZ, THOMAS · 2007 to 2019
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nuclear pore complex (NPC) is the principal gateway for molecular exchange between nucleus and cytoplasm across the nuclear envelope. Due to its sheer size of estimated 50-112MDa and its complex buildup from about 500-1000 individual proteins, it is a difficult object to study for structural biologists. Here, I review the extensive ensemble of high-resolution structures of the building blocks of the NPC. Concurrent with the increase in size and complexity, these latest, large structures and assemblies can now be used as the basis for hybrid approaches, primarily in combination with cryo-electron microscopic analysis, generating the first structure-based assembly models of the NPC. Going forward, the structures will be critically important for a detailed analysis of the NPC, including function, evolution, and assembly.

Indexed as

AnimalsCryoelectron MicroscopyCytoplasmNuclear Poremacromolecular complexesnuclear pore complex

Identifiers

PMID27016207
PMCPMC4886551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.