Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27016153›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2016

Network dynamics during the different stages of hallucinations in schizophrenia.

Stéphanie Lefebvre, Morgane Demeulemeester, Arnaud Leroy, Christine Delmaire, Renaud Lopes, Delphine Pins, Pierre Thomas, Renaud Jardri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stéphanie LefebvreUniv Lille, CNRS UMR-9193, Cognitive and Affective Sciences Laboratory (SCALab), psyCHIC team, F-59000, Lille, France.
Morgane DemeulemeesterUniv Lille, CNRS UMR-9193, Cognitive and Affective Sciences Laboratory (SCALab), psyCHIC team, F-59000, Lille, France.
Arnaud LeroyUniv Lille, CNRS UMR-9193, Cognitive and Affective Sciences Laboratory (SCALab), psyCHIC team, F-59000, Lille, France.
Christine DelmaireCHRU de Lille, Neuroradiology Dpt, Salengro Hospital, F-59037, eLille, France.
Renaud LopesUniv Lille, INSERM U1171, Clinical Imaging Core facility (CI2C), F-59000, Lille, France.
Delphine PinsUniv Lille, CNRS UMR-9193, Cognitive and Affective Sciences Laboratory (SCALab), psyCHIC team, F-59000, Lille, France.
Pierre ThomasUniv Lille, CNRS UMR-9193, Cognitive and Affective Sciences Laboratory (SCALab), psyCHIC team, F-59000, Lille, France.
Renaud JardriUniv Lille, CNRS UMR-9193, Cognitive and Affective Sciences Laboratory (SCALab), psyCHIC team, F-59000, Lille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The majority of patients with schizophrenia suffer from hallucinations. While the triple-network model, which includes the default mode network (DMN), the central executive network (CEN) and the salience network (SAL), has recently been applied to schizophrenia, how this framework could explain the emergence of hallucinations remains unclear. Therefore, complementary brain regions that have been linked to hallucinations, such as the left hippocampus, should also be considered and added to this model. Accordingly, the present study explored the effective connectivity across these four components (i.e., the quadripartite model) during the different stages of hallucinations. Twenty-five patients with schizophrenia participated in a single session of resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging to capture hallucinatory experiences. Based on the participants' self-report of the psychosensory experiences that occurred during scanning, hallucinatory experiences were identified and divided into four stages: periods without hallucination ("OFF"), periods with hallucination ("ON"), transition periods between "OFF" and "ON", and the extinction of the hallucinatory experience ("END"). Using stochastic dynamic causal modeling analysis, this study first confirmed that the SAL played a critical and causal role in switching between the CEN and the DMN in schizophrenia. In addition, effective connectivity within the quadripartite model depended on the hallucinatory stage. In particular, "ON" periods were linked to memory-based sensory input from the hippocampus to the SAL, while "END" periods were associated with a takeover of the CEN in favor of a voluntary process. Finally, the pathophysiological and therapeutic implications of these findings are critically discussed. Hum Brain Mapp 37:2571-2586, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AdultBayes TheoremBrainBrain MappingFemaleHallucinationsHumansMaleModels, NeurologicalNeural PathwaysPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesRestSchizophreniaSelf Reportbrain imagingdynamic causal modelingeffective connectivityhallucinationsintrinsic connectivity networksschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID27016153
PMCPMC6867493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.