Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27016052›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2016

Prediction of improvement in skin fibrosis in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: a EUSTAR analysis.

Rucsandra Dobrota, Britta Maurer, Nicole Graf, Suzana Jordan, Carina Mihai, Otylia Kowal-Bielecka, Yannick Allanore, Oliver Distler, EUSTAR coauthors

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Fibrosis in Immune-Mediated and Autoimmune Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Rucsandra DobrotaDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Cantacuzino Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Britta MaurerDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicole GrafGraf biostatistics, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Suzana JordanDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Carina MihaiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Cantacuzino Hospital, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Otylia Kowal-BieleckaDepartment of Rheumatology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
Yannick AllanoreDepartment of Rheumatology, University Paris Descartes and Cochin Hospital, Paris, France.
Oliver DistlerDivision of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
EUSTAR coauthors
University Hospital of Zurich · CHCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · RODélégation Paris 5 · FRMedical University of Białystok · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesImprovement of skin fibrosis is part of the natural course of diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis (dcSSc). Recognising those patients most likely to improve could help tailoring clinical management and cohort enrichment for clinical trials. In this study, we aimed to identify predictors for improvement of skin fibrosis in patients with dcSSc.

methodsWe performed a longitudinal analysis of the European Scleroderma Trials And Research (EUSTAR) registry including patients with dcSSc, fulfilling American College of Rheumatology criteria, baseline modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) ≥7 and follow-up mRSS at 12±2 months. The primary outcome was skin improvement (decrease in mRSS of >5 points and ≥25%) at 1 year follow-up. A respective increase in mRSS was considered progression. Candidate predictors for skin improvement were selected by expert opinion and logistic regression with bootstrap validation was applied.

resultsFrom the 919 patients included, 218 (24%) improved and 95 (10%) progressed. Eleven candidate predictors for skin improvement were analysed. The final model identified high baseline mRSS and absence of tendon friction rubs as independent predictors of skin improvement. The baseline mRSS was the strongest predictor of skin improvement, independent of disease duration. An upper threshold between 18 and 25 performed best in enriching for progressors over regressors.

conclusionsPatients with advanced skin fibrosis at baseline and absence of tendon friction rubs are more likely to regress in the next year than patients with milder skin fibrosis. These evidence-based data can be implemented in clinical trial design to minimise the inclusion of patients who would regress under standard of care.

Indexed as

AdultDisease ProgressionFemaleFibrosisFollow-Up StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsRegistriesScleroderma, DiffuseSeverity of Illness IndexSkinSkin TestsEpidemiologyOutcomes researchSystemic Sclerosis

Identifiers

PMID27016052
PMCPMC5036205
OpenAlexW2312027770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.