Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27015711›Full record

Trial reportNeuroImage2016

Task-based neurofeedback training: A novel approach toward training executive functions.

S M Hadi Hosseini, Mika Pritchard-Berman, Natasha Sosa, Angelica Ceja, Shelli R Kesler

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in NeuroImage, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Cognitive Training with Neurofeedback Using fNIRS Improves Cognitive Function in Older Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

S M Hadi HosseiniDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Rd., Stanford, CA, 94305-5795, USA. Electronic address: hosseiny@stanford.edu.
Mika Pritchard-BermanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Rd., Stanford, CA, 94305-5795, USA.
Natasha SosaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Rd., Stanford, CA, 94305-5795, USA.
Angelica CejaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University School of Medicine, 401 Quarry Rd., Stanford, CA, 94305-5795, USA.
Shelli R KeslerDepartment of Neuro-oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Funding

Very-long Term Neurocognitive Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors (ProbC2)R01CA172145 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI KESLER, SHELLI R, PALESH, OXANA G · 2012 to 2024
$3.3M
Multimodal MRI Biomarker of Mild Cognitive Impairment in Breast CancerR01NR014195 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KESLER, SHELLI R, WEFEL, JEFFREY SCOTT · 2012 to 2017
$2.5M
Assessment and Treatment of Cognitive Deficits in Breast CancerDP2OD004445 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KESLER, SHELLI R · 2008 to 2008
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172145NIH HHS DP2 OD004445NINR NIH HHS R01 NR014195
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive training is an emergent approach to improve cognitive functions in various neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases. However, current training programs can be relatively lengthy, making adherence potentially difficult for patients with cognitive difficulties. Previous studies suggest that providing individuals with real-time feedback about the level of brain activity (neurofeedback) can potentially help them learn to control the activation of specific brain regions. In the present study, we developed a novel task-based neurofeedback training paradigm that benefits from the effects of neurofeedback in parallel with computerized training. We focused on executive function training given its core involvement in various developmental and neurodegenerative diseases. Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) was employed for providing neurofeedback by measuring changes in oxygenated hemoglobin in the prefrontal cortex. Of the twenty healthy adult participants, ten received real neurofeedback (NFB) on prefrontal activity during cognitive training, and ten were presented with sham feedback (SHAM). Compared with SHAM, the NFB group showed significantly improved executive function performance including measures of working memory after four sessions of training (100min total). The NFB group also showed significantly reduced training-related brain activity in the executive function network including right middle frontal and inferior frontal regions compared with SHAM. Our data suggest that providing neurofeedback along with cognitive training can enhance executive function after a relatively short period of training. Similar designs could potentially be used for patient populations with known neuropathology, potentially helping them to boost/recover the activity in the affected brain regions.

Indexed as

Task Performance and AnalysisAdultBrain MappingCognitionExecutive FunctionFemaleGoalsHumansMaleNeurofeedbackPrefrontal CortexVerbal LearningYoung AdultCognitive stimulationFunctional plasticityNeurofeedbackNIRSPrefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID27015711
PMCPMC4912915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.