ArticlePloS one2016
Individual Differences in the Frequency-Following Response: Relation to Pitch Perception.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Motor signals modulate cortical but not subcortical processing of self-initiated sounds.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Effect of fundamental frequency removal on mistuned harmonic separation thresholds.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Laurel-Yanny percept affects the speech-to-song illusion, but musical anhedonia does not.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Sleep State Influences Early Sound Encoding at Cortical But Not Subcortical Levels.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Frequency Following Responses to Electric Cochlear Stimulation in an Animal Model.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2025Article
- Choir Singing and Music Appreciation Training Enhances Unaided Speech-in-Noise Perception and Frequency Following Responses for Older Adult Hearing Aid Users: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Seminars in hearing · 2025Review
- Duplex perception reveals brainstem auditory representations are modulated by listeners' ongoing percept for speech.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Individual variability in subcortical neural encoding shapes phonetic cue weighting.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Duplex perception reveals brainstem auditory representations are modulated by listeners' ongoing percept for speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- The emergence of idiosyncratic patterns in the frequency-following response during the first year of life.JASA express letters · 2022Article
- Methodological considerations when measuring and analyzing auditory steady-state responses with multi-channel EEG.Current research in neurobiology · 2022Article
- Individual differences in human frequency-following response predict pitch labeling ability.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- MEG Intersubject Phase Locking of Stimulus-Driven Activity during Naturalistic Speech Listening Correlates with Musical Training.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response.Nature communications · 2019Review
- The ability to glimpse dynamic pitch in noise by younger and older listeners.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019Article
- Biometric identification of listener identity from frequency following responses to speech.Journal of neural engineering · 2019Article
- Incongruent pitch cues are associated with increased activation and functional connectivity in the frontal areas.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Auditory Brainstem Representation of the Voice Pitch Contours in the Resolved and Unresolved Components of Mandarin Tones.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2018Article
- On Dynamic Pitch Benefit for Speech Recognition in Speech Masker.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Cortical Correlates of the Auditory Frequency-Following and Onset Responses: EEG and fMRI Evidence.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The scalp-recorded frequency-following response (FFR) is a measure of the auditory nervous system's representation of periodic sound, and may serve as a marker of training-related enhancements, behavioural deficits, and clinical conditions. However, FFRs of healthy normal subjects show considerable variability that remains unexplained. We investigated whether the FFR representation of the frequency content of a complex tone is related to the perception of the pitch of the fundamental frequency. The strength of the fundamental frequency in the FFR of 39 people with normal hearing was assessed when they listened to complex tones that either included or lacked energy at the fundamental frequency. We found that the strength of the fundamental representation of the missing fundamental tone complex correlated significantly with people's general tendency to perceive the pitch of the tone as either matching the frequency of the spectral components that were present, or that of the missing fundamental. Although at a group level the fundamental representation in the FFR did not appear to be affected by the presence or absence of energy at the same frequency in the stimulus, the two conditions were statistically distinguishable for some subjects individually, indicating that the neural representation is not linearly dependent on the stimulus content. In a second experiment using a within-subjects paradigm, we showed that subjects can learn to reversibly select between either fundamental or spectral perception, and that this is accompanied both by changes to the fundamental representation in the FFR and to cortical-based gamma activity. These results suggest that both fundamental and spectral representations coexist, and are available for later auditory processing stages, the requirements of which may also influence their relative strength and thus modulate FFR variability. The data also highlight voluntary mode perception as a new paradigm with which to study top-down vs bottom-up mechanisms that support the emerging view of the FFR as the outcome of integrated processing in the entire auditory system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.