ArticleThe ISME journal2016
Consortia of low-abundance bacteria drive sulfate reduction-dependent degradation of fermentation products in peat soil microcosms.
Article in The ISME journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
74 citing papers in PubMed, 191 citations in OpenAlex.
- Activity and diversity of sulfate- and methane-based pathways of anaerobic chitin and N-acetylglucosamine degradation in marine sediments.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- High diversity but limited expression of biosynthetic gene clusters in a peatland microbial community.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Sulfoquinovose degradation by cow rumen microbiota.The ISME journal · 2026Article
- Iron stimulates greenhouse gas production in Southeast Asian peatlands.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Thermophilic and mesophilic sulfate reduction by rare biosphere bacteria in acidic metal-bearing mine wastes from the temperate climate zone.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Rare bacterial subcommunity drives nutrient cycling in phyllosphere habitat of evergreen conifers.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Polymer biodegradation byApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025Article
- The relationship between pomegranate root collar rot and the diversity of fungal communities in its rhizosphere.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Article
- Growth of sulfate-reducing Desulfobacterota and Bacillota at periodic oxygen stress of 50% air-OMicrobiome · 2024Article
- Acidophilic sulphate-reducing bacteria: Diversity, ecophysiology, and applications.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Review
- Sustained bacterial NNature communications · 2024Article
- Electron Transfer in the Biogeochemical Sulfur Cycle.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Sulfate-reducing bacteria unearthed: ecological functions of the diverse prokaryotic group in terrestrial environments.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Review
- Investigating microbial and environmental drivers of nitrification in alkaline forest soil.ISME communications · 2024Article
- Treatment of sugarcane vinasse in AnMBR and UASB: process performance and microbial community comparison.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Do restoration strategies in mangroves recover microbial diversity? A case study in the Yucatan peninsula.PloS one · 2024Article
- Persistent Trace Organic Contaminants Are Transformed Rapidly under Sulfate- and Fe(III)-Reducing Conditions in a Nature-Based Subsurface Water Treatment System.Environmental science & technology · 2023Article
- Oxygen respiration and polysaccharide degradation by a sulfate-reducing acidobacterium.Nature communications · 2023Article
14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Dissimilatory sulfate reduction in peatlands is sustained by a cryptic sulfur cycle and effectively competes with methanogenic degradation pathways. In a series of peat soil microcosms incubated over 50 days, we identified bacterial consortia that responded to small, periodic additions of individual fermentation products (formate, acetate, propionate, lactate or butyrate) in the presence or absence of sulfate. Under sulfate supplementation, net sulfate turnover (ST) steadily increased to 16-174 nmol cm(-3) per day and almost completely blocked methanogenesis. 16S rRNA gene and cDNA amplicon sequencing identified microorganisms whose increases in ribosome numbers strongly correlated to ST. Natively abundant (⩾0.1% estimated genome abundance) species-level operational taxonomic units (OTUs) showed no significant response to sulfate. In contrast, low-abundance OTUs responded significantly to sulfate in incubations with propionate, lactate and butyrate. These OTUs included members of recognized sulfate-reducing taxa (Desulfosporosinus, Desulfopila, Desulfomonile, Desulfovibrio) and also members of taxa that are either yet unknown sulfate reducers or metabolic interaction partners thereof. Most responsive OTUs markedly increased their ribosome content but only weakly increased in abundance. Responsive Desulfosporosinus OTUs even maintained a constantly low population size throughout 50 days, which suggests a novel strategy of rare biosphere members to display activity. Interestingly, two OTUs of the non-sulfate-reducing genus Telmatospirillum (Alphaproteobacteria) showed strongly contrasting preferences towards sulfate in butyrate-amended microcosms, corroborating that closely related microorganisms are not necessarily ecologically coherent. We show that diverse consortia of low-abundance microorganisms can perform peat soil sulfate reduction, a process that exerts control on methane production in these climate-relevant ecosystems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.