Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27014709›Full record

ArticleEGEMS (Washington, DC)2016

Data Extraction and Management in Networks of Observational Health Care Databases for Scientific Research: A Comparison of EU-ADR, OMOP, Mini-Sentinel and MATRICE Strategies.

Rosa Gini, Martijn Schuemie, Jeffrey Brown, Patrick Ryan, Edoardo Vacchi, Massimo Coppola, Walter Cazzola, Preciosa Coloma, Roberto Berni, Gayo Diallo and 8 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EGEMS (Washington, DC), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. TASKA: A modular task management system to support health research studies.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 5 countries.

Rosa GiniAgenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana; Erasmus MC University Medical Center.
Martijn SchuemieJanssen Research & Development, Epidemiology; Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI).
Jeffrey BrownHarvard Medical School.
Patrick RyanJanssen Research & Development, Epidemiology; Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI).
Edoardo VacchiUniversità degli Studi di Milano, Dipartimento di Informatica.
Massimo CoppolaConsiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione.
Walter CazzolaUniversità degli Studi di Milano, Dipartimento di Informatica.
Preciosa ColomaErasmus MC University Medical Center.
Roberto BerniAgenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana.
Gayo DialloUniversité Bordeaux, LESIM - ISPED.
José Luis OliveiraJosé Luis Oliveira University of Aveiro, DETI/IEETA.
Paul AvillachHarvard Medical School.
Gianluca TrifiròErasmus MC University Medical Center.
Peter RijnbeekErasmus MC University Medical Center.
Mariadonata BellentaniAgenzia Nazionale per i Servizi Sanitari Regionali.
Johan van Der LeiErasmus MC University Medical Center.
Niek KlazingaUniversity of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center.
Miriam SturkenboomErasmus MC University Medical Center.
Erasmus MC · NLJanssen (United States) · USUniversity of Milan · ITAcademic Medical Center · NLAgenzia Regionale di Sanità della Toscana · ITBordeaux Population Health · FRCenter for Systems Biology · USHarvard University · USIstituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione "Alessandro Faedo" · ITServizio Sanitario Nazionale · ITUniversity of Aveiro · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe see increased use of existing observational data in order to achieve fast and transparent production of empirical evidence in health care research. Multiple databases are often used to increase power, to assess rare exposures or outcomes, or to study diverse populations. For privacy and sociological reasons, original data on individual subjects can't be shared, requiring a distributed network approach where data processing is performed prior to data sharing. CASE DESCRIPTIONS AND VARIATION AMONG SITES: We created a conceptual framework distinguishing three steps in local data processing: (1) data reorganization into a data structure common across the network; (2) derivation of study variables not present in original data; and (3) application of study design to transform longitudinal data into aggregated data sets for statistical analysis. We applied this framework to four case studies to identify similarities and differences in the United States and Europe: Exploring and Understanding Adverse Drug Reactions by Integrative Mining of Clinical Records and Biomedical Knowledge (EU-ADR), Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP), the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA's) Mini-Sentinel, and the Italian network-the Integration of Content Management Information on the Territory of Patients with Complex Diseases or with Chronic Conditions (MATRICE).

findingsNational networks (OMOP, Mini-Sentinel, MATRICE) all adopted shared procedures for local data reorganization. The multinational EU-ADR network needed locally defined procedures to reorganize its heterogeneous data into a common structure. Derivation of new data elements was centrally defined in all networks but the procedure was not shared in EU-ADR. Application of study design was a common and shared procedure in all the case studies. Computer procedures were embodied in different programming languages, including SAS, R, SQL, Java, and C++.

conclusionUsing our conceptual framework we found several areas that would benefit from research to identify optimal standards for production of empirical knowledge from existing databases.an opportunity to advance evidence-based care management. In addition, formalized CM outcomes assessment methodologies will enable us to compare CM effectiveness across health delivery settings.

Indexed as

Data managementData reuseElectronic Health RecordsHealth Services ResearchPharmacoepidemiologyResearch networks

Identifiers

PMID27014709
PMCPMC4780748
OpenAlexW2260861673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.