Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27014559›Full record

ArticleEuropean physical journal plus2015

Evaluation of uptake and distribution of gold nanoparticles in solid tumors.

Christopher G England, André M Gobin, Hermann B Frieboes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European physical journal plus, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. FeJournal of translational medicine · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Theranostics · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Theranostic nanoparticles for detection and treatment of pancreatic cancer.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher G EnglandDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA; James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
André M GobinDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
Hermann B FrieboesDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA; James Graham Brown Cancer Center, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA; Department of Bioengineering, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143907 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI HILLIS, WILLIAM DANIEL · 2009 to 2013
$15.2M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although nanotherapeutics offer a targeted and potentially less toxic alternative to systemic chemotherapy in cancer treatment, nanotherapeutic transport is typically hindered by abnormal characteristics of tumor tissue. Once nanoparticles targeted to tumor cells arrive in the circulation of tumor vasculature, they must extravasate from irregular vessels and diffuse through the tissue to ideally reach all malignant cells in cytotoxic concentrations. The enhanced permeability and retention effect can be leveraged to promote extravasation of appropriately sized particles from tumor vasculature; however, therapeutic success remains elusive partly due to inadequate intra-tumoral transport promoting heterogeneous nanoparticle uptake and distribution. Irregular tumor vasculature not only hinders particle transport but also sustains hypoxic tissue kregions with quiescent cells, which may be unaffected by cycle-dependent chemotherapeutics released from nanoparticles and thus regrow tumor tissue following nanotherapy. Furthermore, a large proportion of systemically injected nanoparticles may become sequestered by the reticuloendothelial system, resulting in overall diminished efficacy. We review recent work evaluating the uptake and distribution of gold nanoparticles in pre-clinical tumor models, with the goal to help improve nanotherapy outcomes. We also examine the potential role of novel layered gold nanoparticles designed to address some of these critical issues, assessing their uptake and transport in cancerous tissue.

Identifiers

PMID27014559
PMCPMC4800753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.