Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27014509›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2016

Flower color preferences of insects and livestock: effects on Gentiana lutea reproductive success.

Mar Sobral, María Losada, Tania Veiga, Javier Guitián, José Guitián, Pablo Guitián

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mar SobralDepartamento de Bioloxía Celular e Ecoloxía/Facultade de Bioloxía, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela , Santiago de Compostela , Spain.
María LosadaDepartamento de Bioloxía Celular e Ecoloxía/Facultade de Bioloxía, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela , Santiago de Compostela , Spain.
Tania VeigaDepartamento de Bioloxía Celular e Ecoloxía/Facultade de Bioloxía, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela , Santiago de Compostela , Spain.
Javier GuitiánDepartamento de Botánica/Facultade de Bioloxía, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela , Santiago de Compostela , Spain.
José GuitiánDepartamento de Bioloxía Celular e Ecoloxía/Facultade de Bioloxía, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela , Santiago de Compostela , Spain.
Pablo GuitiánDepartamento de Botánica/Facultade de Bioloxía, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela , Santiago de Compostela , Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Angiosperms diversification was primarily driven by pollinator agents, but non-pollinator agents also promoted floral evolution. Gentiana lutea shows pollinator driven flower color variation in NW Spain. We test whether insect herbivores and livestock, which frequently feed in G.lutea, play a role in G. lutea flower color variation, by answering the following questions: (i) Do insect herbivores and grazing livestock show flower color preferences when feeding on G. lutea? (ii) Do mutualists (pollinators) and antagonists (seed predators, insect herbivores and livestock) jointly affect G. lutea reproductive success? Insect herbivores fed more often on yellow flowering individuals but they did not affect seed production, whereas livestock affected seed production but did not show clear color preferences. Our data indicate that flower color variation of G. lutea is not affected by insect herbivores or grazing livestock.

Indexed as

Flower color variationGentiana luteaHerbivore preferencesInsect herbivoryLarge mammal herbivory

Identifiers

PMID27014509
PMCPMC4806593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.