ArticleNetwork science (Cambridge University Press)
Stickiness of respondent-driven sampling recruitment chains.
Article in Network science (Cambridge University Press). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measuring Network Sizes in the Context of Respondent Driven Sampling: Evidence from Two Independent Surveys.Survey research methods · 2025Article
- Engaging Latina breast cancer survivors in research: building a social network research registry.Translational behavioral medicine · 2018Article
- Identification of Homophily and Preferential Recruitment in Respondent-Driven Sampling.American journal of epidemiology · 2018Article
- HIV Risk, Prevalence, and Access to Care Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in Lebanon.AIDS research and human retroviruses · 2017Article
- NEW SURVEY QUESTIONS AND ESTIMATORS FOR NETWORK CLUSTERING WITH RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING DATA.Sociological methodology · 2017Article
- THE GRAPHICAL STRUCTURE OF RESPONDENT-DRIVEN SAMPLING.Sociological methodology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.