Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27014369›Full record

ReviewFibrogenesis & tissue repair2016

Biomaterials for hollow organ tissue engineering.

Eseelle K Hendow, Pauline Guhmann, Bernice Wright, Panagiotis Sofokleous, Nina Parmar, Richard M Day

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fibrogenesis & tissue repair, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Building Scaffolds for Tubular Tissue Engineering.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Folding artificial mucosa with cell-laden hydrogels guided by mechanics models.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Naturally-Derived Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Applications.Advances in experimental medicine and biology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eseelle K HendowApplied Biomedical Engineering Group, Division of Medicine, University College London, 21 University Street, London, UK.
Pauline GuhmannApplied Biomedical Engineering Group, Division of Medicine, University College London, 21 University Street, London, UK.
Bernice WrightApplied Biomedical Engineering Group, Division of Medicine, University College London, 21 University Street, London, UK.
Panagiotis SofokleousApplied Biomedical Engineering Group, Division of Medicine, University College London, 21 University Street, London, UK.
Nina ParmarApplied Biomedical Engineering Group, Division of Medicine, University College London, 21 University Street, London, UK.
Richard M DayApplied Biomedical Engineering Group, Division of Medicine, University College London, 21 University Street, London, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L002752/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering is a rapidly advancing field that is likely to transform how medicine is practised in the near future. For hollow organs such as those found in the cardiovascular and respiratory systems or gastrointestinal tract, tissue engineering can provide replacement of the entire organ or provide restoration of function to specific regions. Larger tissue-engineered constructs often require biomaterial-based scaffold structures to provide support and structure for new tissue growth. Consideration must be given to the choice of material and manufacturing process to ensure the de novo tissue closely matches the mechanical and physiological properties of the native tissue. This review will discuss some of the approaches taken to date for fabricating hollow organ scaffolds and the selection of appropriate biomaterials.

Indexed as

BiocompatibleBiomaterialsRegenerative medicineScaffoldTissue engineering

Identifiers

PMID27014369
PMCPMC4806416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.