Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27014320›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2016

Putting the Spotlight Back on Plant Suspension Cultures.

Rita B Santos, Rita Abranches, Rainer Fischer, Markus Sack, Tanja Holland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Recombinant Protein Drugs: A 2025 Update.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Changes in Cell Aggregation inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Impact ofBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. From Division to Death: Metabolomic Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  20. Review

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rita B SantosPlant Cell Biology Laboratory, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier Oeiras, Portugal.
Rita AbranchesPlant Cell Biology Laboratory, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier Oeiras, Portugal.
Rainer FischerFraunhofer-Institut für Molekularbiologie und Angewandte Oekologie (IME), Integrated Production PlatformsAachen, Germany; Biology VII, Institute for Molecular Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen UniversityAachen, Germany.
Markus SackBiology VII, Institute for Molecular Biotechnology, RWTH Aachen University Aachen, Germany.
Tanja HollandFraunhofer-Institut für Molekularbiologie und Angewandte Oekologie (IME), Integrated Production Platforms Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant cell suspension cultures have several advantages that make them suitable for the production of recombinant proteins. They can be cultivated under aseptic conditions using classical fermentation technology, they are easy to scale-up for manufacturing, and the regulatory requirements are similar to those established for well-characterized production systems based on microbial and mammalian cells. It is therefore no surprise that taliglucerase alfa (Elelyso®)-the first licensed recombinant pharmaceutical protein derived from plants-is produced in plant cell suspension cultures. But despite this breakthrough, plant cells are still largely neglected compared to transgenic plants and the more recent plant-based transient expression systems. Here, we revisit plant cell suspension cultures and highlight recent developments in the field that show how the rise of plant cells parallels that of Chinese hamster ovary cells, currently the most widespread and successful manufacturing platform for biologics. These developments include medium optimization, process engineering, statistical experimental designs, scale-up/scale-down models, and process analytical technologies. Significant yield increases for diverse target proteins will encourage a gold rush to adopt plant cells as a platform technology, and the first indications of this breakthrough are already on the horizon.

Indexed as

biopharmaceuticalsBY-2plant cell culturesplant suspension culturesprotein production

Identifiers

PMID27014320
PMCPMC4786539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.