Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27014312›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2016

Genomic Tools in Groundnut Breeding Program: Status and Perspectives.

P Janila, Murali T Variath, Manish K Pandey, Haile Desmae, Babu N Motagi, Patrick Okori, Surendra S Manohar, A L Rathnakumar, T Radhakrishnan, Boshou Liao and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Understanding the genetics of quality traits in groundnut: GWAS highlights drought-responsive markers and candidate genes.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Designing future peanut: the power of genomics-assisted breeding.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

P JanilaInternational Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics Patancheru, India.
Murali T VariathInternational Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics Patancheru, India.
Manish K PandeyInternational Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics Patancheru, India.
Haile DesmaeInternational Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics Bamako, Mali.
Babu N MotagiInternational Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics Kano, Nigeria.
Patrick OkoriInternational Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics Lilongwe, Malawi.
Surendra S ManoharInternational Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics Patancheru, India.
A L RathnakumarDirectorate of Groundnut Research Junagadh, India.
T RadhakrishnanDirectorate of Groundnut Research Junagadh, India.
Boshou LiaoOil Crops Research Institute Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Wuhan, China.
Rajeev K VarshneyInternational Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics Patancheru, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Groundnut, a nutrient-rich food legume, is cultivated world over. It is valued for its good quality cooking oil, energy and protein rich food, and nutrient-rich fodder. Globally, groundnut improvement programs have developed varieties to meet the preferences of farmers, traders, processors, and consumers. Enhanced yield, tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses and quality parameters have been the target traits. Spurt in genetic information of groundnut was facilitated by development of molecular markers, genetic, and physical maps, generation of expressed sequence tags (EST), discovery of genes, and identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) for some important biotic and abiotic stresses and quality traits. The first groundnut variety developed using marker assisted breeding (MAB) was registered in 2003. Since then, USA, China, Japan, and India have begun to use genomic tools in routine groundnut improvement programs. Introgression lines that combine foliar fungal disease resistance and early maturity were developed using MAB. Establishment of marker-trait associations (MTA) paved way to integrate genomic tools in groundnut breeding for accelerated genetic gain. Genomic Selection (GS) tools are employed to improve drought tolerance and pod yield, governed by several minor effect QTLs. Draft genome sequence and low cost genotyping tools such as genotyping by sequencing (GBS) are expected to accelerate use of genomic tools to enhance genetic gains for target traits in groundnut.

Indexed as

breedinggenomicsgroundnutmarkersselectionvarieties

Identifiers

PMID27014312
PMCPMC4794498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.