Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27014043›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016

Motor Skill Acquisition and Retention after Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation in Healthy Humans.

Menno P Veldman, Inge Zijdewind, Nicola A Maffiuletti, Tibor Hortobágyi

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02854176 (Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation to Improve Motor Control in Patients Suffering From Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02854176 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation to Improve Motor Control in Patients Suffering From Knee Osteoarthritis

TypeinterventionalSponsorMenno VeldmanRan2016 to 2017Enrolled20ConditionsOsteoarthritis, KneeArmsSomatosensory electrical stimulation, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Effect of Acupuncture on Timeliness of Male Shoulder Joint Endurance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Menno P VeldmanCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Inge ZijdewindDepartment of Neuroscience, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.
Nicola A MaffiulettiHuman Performance Lab, Schulthess Clinic Zurich, Switzerland.
Tibor HortobágyiCenter for Human Movement Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen Groningen, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatosensory electrical stimulation (SES) can increase motor performance, presumably through a modulation of neuronal excitability. Because the effects of SES can outlast the period of stimulation, we examined the possibility that SES can also enhance the retention of motor performance, motor memory consolidation, after 24 h (Day 2) and 7 days (Day 7), that such effects would be scaled by SES duration, and that such effects were mediated by changes in aspects of corticospinal excitability, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Healthy young adults (n = 40) received either 20 (SES-20), 40 (SES-40), or 60 min (SES-60) of real SES, or sham SES (SES-0). The results showed SES-20 increased visuomotor performance on Day 2 (15%) and Day 7 (17%) and SES-60 increased visuomotor performance on Day 7 (11%; all p < 0.05) compared with SES-0. Specific responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) increased immediately after SES (p < 0.05) but not on Days 2 and 7. In addition, changes in behavioral and neurophysiological parameters did not correlate, suggesting that paths and structures other than the ones TMS can assay must be (also) involved in the increases in visuomotor performance after SES. As examined in the present study, low-intensity peripheral electrical nerve stimulation did not have acute effects on healthy adults' visuomotor performance but SES had delayed effects in the form of enhanced motor memory consolidation that were not scaled by the duration of SES.

Indexed as

motor evoked potentialmotor learningmotor memory consolidationprimary motor cortextranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID27014043
PMCPMC4792880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.