ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2016
Motor Skill Acquisition and Retention after Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation in Healthy Humans.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02854176 (Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation to Improve Motor Control in Patients Suffering From Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Somatosensory Electrical Stimulation to Improve Motor Control in Patients Suffering From Knee Osteoarthritis
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- fNIRS-Based Network Signatures of Sensory-Primed Bilateral Arm Training in Subacute Stroke Recovery.Journal of biophotonics · 2026Article
- Methodological optimization for eliciting robust median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials for realtime single trial applications.Journal of neural engineering · 2026Article
- The Effects of Sensory Electrical Stimulation and Local Vibration on Motor Learning and Motor Function.Physical therapy research · 2025Review
- No effect of whole-hand water flow stimulation on skill acquisition and retention during sensorimotor adaptation.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Article
- Top-down and bottom-up stimulation techniques combined with action observation treatment in stroke rehabilitation: a perspective.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Review
- Sensory electrical stimulation and postural balance: a comprehensive review.European journal of applied physiology · 2021Review
- Effect of Acupuncture on Timeliness of Male Shoulder Joint Endurance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Temporal Profile of Descending Cortical Modulation of Spinal Excitability: Group and Individual-Specific Effects.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Somatosensory electrical stimulation (SES) can increase motor performance, presumably through a modulation of neuronal excitability. Because the effects of SES can outlast the period of stimulation, we examined the possibility that SES can also enhance the retention of motor performance, motor memory consolidation, after 24 h (Day 2) and 7 days (Day 7), that such effects would be scaled by SES duration, and that such effects were mediated by changes in aspects of corticospinal excitability, short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF). Healthy young adults (n = 40) received either 20 (SES-20), 40 (SES-40), or 60 min (SES-60) of real SES, or sham SES (SES-0). The results showed SES-20 increased visuomotor performance on Day 2 (15%) and Day 7 (17%) and SES-60 increased visuomotor performance on Day 7 (11%; all p < 0.05) compared with SES-0. Specific responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) increased immediately after SES (p < 0.05) but not on Days 2 and 7. In addition, changes in behavioral and neurophysiological parameters did not correlate, suggesting that paths and structures other than the ones TMS can assay must be (also) involved in the increases in visuomotor performance after SES. As examined in the present study, low-intensity peripheral electrical nerve stimulation did not have acute effects on healthy adults' visuomotor performance but SES had delayed effects in the form of enhanced motor memory consolidation that were not scaled by the duration of SES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.