Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27013936›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016

Generation of Locomotor-Like Activity in the Isolated Rat Spinal Cord Using Intraspinal Electrical Microstimulation Driven by a Digital Neuromorphic CPG.

Sébastien Joucla, Matthieu Ambroise, Timothée Levi, Thierry Lafon, Philippe Chauvet, Sylvain Saïghi, Yannick Bornat, Noëlle Lewis, Sylvie Renaud, Blaise Yvert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sébastien JouclaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institute for Cognitive and Integrative Neuroscience (INCIA), UMR 5287Talence, France; Institute for Cognitive and Integrative Neuroscience (INCIA), UMR 5287, University of BordeauxTalence, France.
Matthieu AmbroiseLaboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, UMR 5218, University of BordeauxTalence, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, UMR 5218Talence, France.
Timothée LeviLaboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, UMR 5218, University of BordeauxTalence, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, UMR 5218Talence, France.
Thierry LafonCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institute for Cognitive and Integrative Neuroscience (INCIA), UMR 5287Talence, France; Institute for Cognitive and Integrative Neuroscience (INCIA), UMR 5287, University of BordeauxTalence, France.
Philippe ChauvetCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institute for Cognitive and Integrative Neuroscience (INCIA), UMR 5287Talence, France; Institute for Cognitive and Integrative Neuroscience (INCIA), UMR 5287, University of BordeauxTalence, France.
Sylvain SaïghiLaboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, UMR 5218, University of BordeauxTalence, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, UMR 5218Talence, France.
Yannick BornatLaboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, UMR 5218, University of BordeauxTalence, France; Bordeaux INP, Laboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, UMR 5218Talence, France.
Noëlle LewisLaboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, UMR 5218, University of BordeauxTalence, France; Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Laboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, UMR 5218Talence, France.
Sylvie RenaudLaboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, UMR 5218, University of BordeauxTalence, France; Bordeaux INP, Laboratoire de l'Intégration du Matériau au Système, UMR 5218Talence, France.
Blaise YvertCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institute for Cognitive and Integrative Neuroscience (INCIA), UMR 5287Talence, France; Institute for Cognitive and Integrative Neuroscience (INCIA), UMR 5287, University of BordeauxTalence, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Clinatec-Lab, U1205Grenoble, France; Université Grenoble Alpes, Clinatec-Lab, U1205Grenoble, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural prostheses based on electrical microstimulation offer promising perspectives to restore functions following lesions of the central nervous system (CNS). They require the identification of appropriate stimulation sites and the coordination of their activation to achieve the restoration of functional activity. On the long term, a challenging perspective is to control microstimulation by artificial neural networks hybridized to the living tissue. Regarding the use of this strategy to restore locomotor activity in the spinal cord, to date, there has been no proof of principle of such hybrid approach driving intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS). Here, we address a first step toward this goal in the neonatal rat spinal cord isolated ex vivo, which can display locomotor-like activity while offering an easy access to intraspinal circuitry. Microelectrode arrays were inserted in the lumbar region to determine appropriate stimulation sites to elicit elementary bursting patterns on bilateral L2/L5 ventral roots. Two intraspinal sites were identified at L1 level, one on each side of the spinal cord laterally from the midline and approximately at a median position dorso-ventrally. An artificial CPG implemented on digital integrated circuit (FPGA) was built to generate alternating activity and was hybridized to the living spinal cord to drive electrical microstimulation on these two identified sites. Using this strategy, sustained left-right and flexor-extensor alternating activity on bilateral L2/L5 ventral roots could be generated in either whole or thoracically transected spinal cords. These results are a first step toward hybrid artificial/biological solutions based on electrical microstimulation for the restoration of lost function in the injured CNS.

Indexed as

hybrid neural networksneural prosthesesneuromorphic hardwarerehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID27013936
PMCPMC4779903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.