Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27013910›Full record

ArticleSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2016

Pediatrician's cough and cold medication prescription for hypothetical cases - A cross-sectional multi-centric study.

Sudha Chandelia, Mukesh Dhankar, Meetu Salhan

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Controversies in Cough Management: An Indian Perspective.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sudha ChandeliaDepartment of Pediatrics, Critical Care Division, Pt. B.D. Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Mukesh DhankarDepartment of Pediatrics, Critical Care Division, Pt. B.D. Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Meetu SalhanDepartment of Pediatrics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Pandit Bhagwat Dayal Sharma Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · INVardhman Mahavir Medical College & Safdarjung Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConcerns over inappropriate use of cough and cold medication (CCM) in children have been raised. In addition to being ineffective, these are now considered toxic for young children. Despite this fact studies from some regions have shown high use of these medications by physicians. However data on pediatricians and from India are negligible.

aimTo study the burden and patterns of cough and cold medications use by pediatricians for hypothetical cases.

methodsIn this cross-sectional study; 172 pediatricians of various hospitals of Delhi and Haryana were enrolled from February 15 to March 15, 2012. They were contacted personally by authors and asked to write their prescriptions for two hypothetical case scenarios [having cough and cold] of two different age groups; (1) less than 2 years and (2) 2-5 years. We made two categories as recommendations exist for children less than 2 years while recommendations for the second category are underway. RESULTS were summarized as percentages, counts and; presented in tables and figures. Chi square test was used to establish association between categorical variables of subgroups.

resultsResponse rate was 93%. The most used CCM was antihistaminics (82%) and systemic sympathomimetics (48%). The use of CCM was significantly less in teaching hospitals as compared to non-teaching (77% vs. 95%; p-value - 0.025). However there was no statistical difference in the practice of post graduates and more senior pediatricians (p value-0.895). No difference in CCM use in two age groups {(82% (less than 2 years) vs. 85% (2-5 years); p-value - 0.531} was observed.

conclusionOverall use of CCM is still high irrespective of patient age, pediatrician's seniority or hospital setting. Efforts should be made to create awareness among the pediatricians regarding cautious use of these medications.

Indexed as

CCM, cough and cold medicationCough and cold medicationCPM, chlorpheniramineDPH, diphenhydramineDXT, dextromethorphanEfficacyMI, multiple ingredientsOTC, over the counterPE, phenylephrinePG, post-graduatePRZ, promethazinePS, pseudoephedrinept., patientSI, single ingredientToxicity

Identifiers

PMID27013910
PMCPMC4792892
OpenAlexW2017289158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.