Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27013905›Full record

ReviewSaudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society2016

Nanogels as potential nanomedicine carrier for treatment of cancer: A mini review of the state of the art.

Govind Soni, Khushwant S Yadav

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 194 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Nanogels as novel drug nanocarriers for CNS drug delivery.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Uniquely sized nanogelsRSC advances · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. A nanoemulsion-based nanogel ofJournal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Govind SoniDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rajeev Gandhi College of Pharmacy, Salaiya, Kolar Road, Bhopal 462042, MP, India.
Khushwant S YadavDepartment of Pharmaceutics, Rajeev Gandhi College of Pharmacy, Salaiya, Kolar Road, Bhopal 462042, MP, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanogels are being explored as drug delivery agents for targeting cancer due to their easy tailoring properties and ability to efficiently encapsulate therapeutics of diverse nature through simple mechanisms. Nanogels are proficiently internalized by the target cells, avoid accumulating in nontarget tissues thereby lower the therapeutic dosage and minimize harmful side effects. However, there is an urgent need for relevant clinical data from nanogels so as to allow translation of the nanogel concept into a viable therapeutic application for the treatment of cancer. This review highlights some of the recent progress in nanogels as a carrier in the field of nanomedicine for the treatment of cancer. The present review critically analyzes the use of extracellular pH targeting for nanogels, siRNA delivery, PEGylated nanogels, multi-responsive nanogels and intracellular delivery of nanogels for improved therapy of cancer.

Indexed as

Intracellular deliveryNanogel carriersPEGylated nanogelssiRNAStimuli-responsive nanogelsTumor extracellular pH targeting

Identifiers

PMID27013905
PMCPMC4792897
OpenAlexW2073944799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.