Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27013868›Full record

Observational studyClinical interventions in aging2016

The prognostic value of the plasma N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level on all-cause death and major cardiovascular events in a community-based population.

Qiwei Zhu, Wenkai Xiao, Yongyi Bai, Ping Ye, Leiming Luo, Peng Gao, Hongmei Wu, Jie Bai

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical interventions in aging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Role of circulating factors in cardiac aging.Journal of thoracic disease · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiwei ZhuDepartment of Geriatric Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Wenkai XiaoDepartment of Geriatric Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yongyi BaiDepartment of Geriatric Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Ping YeDepartment of Geriatric Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Leiming LuoDepartment of Geriatric Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Peng GaoDepartment of Geriatric Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Hongmei WuDepartment of Geriatric Cardiology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jie BaiDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite growing evidence that N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has an important prognostic value for patients with cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, etc, the prognostic significance of NT-proBNP levels in the general population has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significance of NT-proBNP in a community population.

methodsThis is a community-based prospective survey of residents from two communities in Beijing conducted for a routine health status checkup. Out of 1,860 individuals who were eligible for inclusion from 2007 to 2009, 1,499 completed a follow-up and were assessed for the prognostic value of NT-proBNP in 2013. A questionnaire was used for end point events. Anthropometry and blood pressure were measured. Plasma NT-proBNP, creatinine, lipids, and glucose were determined.

resultsA total of 1,499 subjects with complete data were included in the analysis. Participants were divided into four groups according to baseline NT-proBNP levels (quartile 1, <19.8 pg/mL; quartile 2, 19.8-41.6 pg/mL; quartile 3, 41.7-81.8 pg/mL; quartile 4, ≥81.9 pg/mL). During a median 4.8-year follow-up period, the all-cause mortality rate rose from 0.8% in the lowest concentration NT-proBNP group (<19.8 pg/mL) to 7.8% in the highest NT-proBNP group (≥81.9 pg/mL; P<0.001). The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) increased from 3.1% in the lowest NT-proBNP group to 18.9% in the highest group (P<0.001). Individuals in the highest NT-proBNP group (≥81.9 pg/mL) were associated with higher risk of all-cause death and MACEs compared with the lowest NT-proBNP group using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and the Cox proportional hazard model after adjusting for age, sex, and traditional risk factors.

conclusionThe plasma NT-proBNP level is a strong and independent prognosis factor for all-cause death and MACEs in the community population. The NT-proBNP cut-point for the prognostic value remains to be further studied. NT-proBNP is a strong and independent prognostic factor for all-cause death and MACEs in individuals older than 65 years and MACEs in individuals younger than 65 years.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBeijingBiomarkersBlood GlucoseCardiovascular DiseasesCreatinineFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLinear ModelsLipidsMaleMiddle AgedMortalityMultivariate AnalysisBiomarkersBlood GlucoseCreatinineLipidsNatriuretic Peptide, BrainPeptide Fragmentspro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)community populationNT-proBNPprognosis

Identifiers

PMID27013868
PMCPMC4777226
OpenAlexW2284348829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.