Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27013618›Full record

ArticleBMJ supportive & palliative care2019

Factors associated with variation in hospital use at the end of life in England.

Martin Bardsley, Theo Georghiou, Ruth Spence, John Billings

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patterns of acute hospital and specialist palliative care use among people with non-curative upper gastrointestinal cancer.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin BardsleyNuffield Trust, London, UK.
Theo GeorghiouNuffield Trust, London, UK.
Ruth SpenceCentre for Abuse and Trauma Studies, Middlesex University, London, UK.
John BillingsRobert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University, New York, New York, USA.
Nuffield Trust · GBMiddlesex University · GBWagner College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo identify the relative importance of factors influencing hospital use at the end of life.

designRetrospective cohort study of person and health system effects on hospital use in the past 12 months modelling differences in admissions, bed days and whether a person died in hospital.

settingResidents in England for the period 2009/2010 to 2011/2012 using Hospital Episodes Statistics (HES) data from all acute care hospitals in England funded by the National Health Service (NHS).

participants1 223 859 people registered with a GP in England who died (decedents) in England (April 2009-March 2012) with a record of NHS hospital care.

main outcome measuresHospital admissions, and hospital bed days and place of death (in or out of hospital) in the past 12 months of life.

resultsThe mean number of admissions in the past 12 months of life averaged 2.28 occupying 30.05 bed days-excluding 9.8% of patients with no hospital history. A total of 50.8% of people died in hospital. Difference in hospital use was associated with a range of patient descriptors (age, gender and ethnicity). The variables with the greatest 'explanatory power' were those that described the diagnoses and causes of death. So, for example, 65% of the variability in the model of hospital admissions was explained by diagnoses. Only moderate levels of variation were explained by the hospital provider variables for admissions and deaths in hospital, though the impacts on total bed days was large.

conclusionsComparative analyses of hospital utilisation should standardise for a range of patient specific variables. Though the models indicated some degree of variability associated with individual providers, the scale of this was not great for admissions and death in hospital but the variability associated with length of stay differences suggests that attempts to optimise hospital use should look at differences in lengths of stay and bed use. This study adds important new information about variability in admissions by diagnostic group, and variability in bed days by diagnostic group and eventual cause of death.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEnglandFemaleHospitalizationHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedHospital careService evaluationTerminal care

Identifiers

PMID27013618
PMCPMC6582820
OpenAlexW2307521355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.