Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27013464›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2016

PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice.

Gill Harvey, Alison Kitson

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 627 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
627citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04366440 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

De-Implementation of Unnecessary Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2020 to 2024Enrolled18,267ConditionsSurgical Site InfectionArmsOrder set review and modification with facilitation, Order set review and modification
NCT07102914 naenrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Building Effective Evidence-Based Services at New Haven Adult Education

TypeinterventionalSponsorYale UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled340ConditionsBehavioral Health ChallengesArmsScreening, Brief Intervention and Referral for Treatment (SBIRT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

627 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

567 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gill HarveySchool of Nursing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia. gillian.harvey@adelaide.edu.au.
Alison KitsonSchool of Nursing, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services, or PARIHS framework, was first published in 1998. Since this time, work has been ongoing to further develop, refine and test it. Widely used as an organising or conceptual framework to help both explain and predict why the implementation of evidence into practice is or is not successful, PARIHS was one of the first frameworks to make explicit the multi-dimensional and complex nature of implementation as well as highlighting the central importance of context. Several critiques of the framework have also pointed out its limitations and suggested areas for improvement. DISCUSSION: Building on the published critiques and a number of empirical studies, this paper introduces a revised version of the framework, called the integrated or i-PARIHS framework. The theoretical antecedents of the framework are described as well as outlining the revised and new elements, notably, the revision of how evidence is described; how the individual and teams are incorporated; and how context is further delineated. We describe how the framework can be operationalised and draw on case study data to demonstrate the preliminary testing of the face and content validity of the revised framework. This paper is presented for deliberation and discussion within the implementation science community. Responding to a series of critiques and helpful feedback on the utility of the original PARIHS framework, we seek feedback on the proposed improvements to the framework. We believe that the i-PARIHS framework creates a more integrated approach to understand the theoretical complexity from which implementation science draws its propositions and working hypotheses; that the new framework is more coherent and comprehensive and at the same time maintains it intuitive appeal; and that the models of facilitation described enable its more effective operationalisation.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareDiffusion of InnovationTranslational Research, BiomedicalFacilitationFacilitator roleImplementation frameworki-PARIHSPARIHS

Identifiers

PMID27013464
PMCPMC4807546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.