Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27013325›Full record

Observational studyLangenbeck's archives of surgery2016

Adherence to ERAS elements in major visceral surgery-an observational pilot study.

Steffen Wolk, Marius Distler, Benjamin Müssle, Susanne Söthje, Jürgen Weitz, Thilo Welsch

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Use of Activity Tracking in Major Visceral Surgery-the Enhanced Perioperative Mobilization Trial: a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2019
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Implementation of a multidisciplinary perioperative protocol in major emergency abdominal surgery.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Steffen WolkDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Marius DistlerDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Benjamin MüssleDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Susanne SöthjeDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jürgen WeitzDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Thilo WelschDepartment of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany. thilo.welsch@uniklinikum-dresden.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs have been introduced increasingly into major visceral surgery. Key elements target on early drain removal and mobilization of the patients; however, reporting of adherence to ERAS protocols has often been insufficiently assessed. The present study aims to prospectively evaluate ERAS compliance after major visceral surgery.

methodsA prospective pilot study was designed, and 34 patients scheduled for major hepatopancreatic or gastric surgery were followed postoperatively until postoperative day (POD) 10. Analgesia and drain management, diet, mobilization, willingness to exercise, and the use of discharge criteria were accurately assessed within an established ERAS protocol scenario.

resultsThirty-one cases were analyzed that consisted of 54.8 % major pancreatic, 29.0 % hepatic, and 16.1 % gastric resections. The median hospital stay was 12.5 days, and 83.9 % of the patients met the objective criteria before discharge. By POD 4, wound, epidural, and urinary catheters were still in place in 70, 60, and 40 % of the patients, respectively. Fifty percent of the patients ambulated out of bed until POD 2. The cumulative duration of postoperative mobilization per day ranged from 15 to 155 min, and only 40 % of the patients felt comfortable with additional mobilization or physical exercise.

conclusionsAdherence to ERAS protocols is poorly reported. The results indicate a discrepancy between ERAS targets and actual practice in comorbid patients undergoing major visceral surgery, need for a prompt redefinition of ERAS mobilization targets, need for the improvement of counseling, and need for the implementation of ERAS principles.

Indexed as

GastrectomyGuideline AdherenceHepatectomyPancreatectomyPostoperative CareAgedClinical ProtocolsEarly AmbulationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesRecovery of FunctionERASFast trackMobilizationPancreatic surgeryVisceral surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.