ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2016
Comparison of diameters of ipsilateral and contralateral internal mammary arteries by breast MRI in patients with unilateral breast cancer.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging versus Ultrasonic Diffused Optical Tomography in Early Diagnosis of Breast Cancer.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeWe compared maximal diameters of ipsilateral (IMA) and contralateral (IMA) internal mammary arteries in patients with unilateral breast cancer and analyze the implications of enlargements of ipsilateral or contralateral IMAs in relation to histopathologic factors. MATERIALS AND
methodsOf 568 women who underwent breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations from January 2009 to May 2012, 196 had unilateral, histologically proven breast cancer. In 156 women, maximal IMA diameters in the second intercostal space were measured by two blinded radiologists in left and right sides using nonenhanced axial T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequence images.
resultsIn the 156 study patients, mean maximal diameter of ipsilateral IMAs (2.37 ± 0.60 mm) was significantly larger than that of contralateral IMAs (2.03 ± 0.58 mm) (p = 0.00). Ipsilateral IMA enlargement was present in 66.7 % of the patients (104 of 156). Furthermore, ipsilateral IMA enlargement was found to be significantly associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) expression (p = 0.039).
conclusionsMaximal IMA diameter was significantly greater in ipsilateral sides in breast cancer patients. Findings suggest ipsilateral IMA enlargement detected by MRI might be a useful additional predictor of HER-2 expression in unilateral breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.