Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27012911›Full record

Observational studyBMC cardiovascular disorders2016

Effectiveness comparison of cardio-selective to non-selective β-blockers and their association with mortality and morbidity in end-stage renal disease: a retrospective cohort study.

Theresa I Shireman, Jonathan D Mahnken, Milind A Phadnis, Edward F Ellerbeck

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current Knowledge of Beta-Blockers in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A Comparative Study of Carvedilol Versus Metoprolol Initiation and 1-Year Mortality Among Individuals Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2018
    Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Theresa I ShiremanHealth Services Policy & Practice and the Center for Gerontology & Health Care Research, Brown University School of Public Health, 121 South Main St, Box-G-S121-6, Providence, RI, 02912, USA. theresa_shireman@brown.edu.
Jonathan D MahnkenBiostatistics, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Milind A PhadnisBiostatistics, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
Edward F EllerbeckPreventive Medicine and Public Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, KS, USA.
University of Kansas · USBrown University · USThe University of Kansas Health System · US

Funding

Are Cardioprotective Medications Effective in ESRD?R01DK080111 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SHIREMAN, THERESA I. · 2008 to 2011
$1.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK080111
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWithin-class comparative effectiveness studies of β-blockers have not been performed in the chronic dialysis setting. With widespread cardiac disease in these patients and potential mechanistic differences within the class, we examined whether mortality and morbidity outcomes varied between cardio-selective and non-selective β-blockers.

methodsRetrospective observational study of within class β-blocker exposure among a national cohort of new chronic dialysis patients (N = 52,922) with hypertension and dual eligibility (Medicare-Medicaid). New β-blocker users were classified according to their exclusive use of one of the subclasses. Outcomes were all-cause mortality (ACM) and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality (CVMM). The associations of cardio-selective and non-selective agents on outcomes were adjusted for baseline characteristics using Cox proportional hazards.

resultsThere were 4938 new β-blocker users included in the ACM model and 4537 in the CVMM model: 77 % on cardio-selective β-blockers. Exposure to cardio-selective and non-selective agents during the follow-up period was comparable, as measured by proportion of days covered (0.56 vs. 0.53 in the ACM model; 0.56 vs 0.54 in the CVMM model). Use of cardio-selective β-blockers was associated with lower risk for mortality (AHR = 0.84; 99 % CI = 0.72-0.97, p = 0.0026) and lower risk for CVMM events (AHR = 0.86; 99 % CI = 0.75-0.99, p = 0.0042).

conclusionAmong new β-blockers users on chronic dialysis, cardio-selective agents were associated with a statistically significant 16 % reduction in mortality and 14 % in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality relative to non-selective β-blocker users. A randomized clinical trial would be appropriate to more definitively answer whether cardio-selective β-blockers are superior to non-selective β-blockers in the setting of chronic dialysis.

Indexed as

Renal DialysisAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAdultAgedAntihypertensive AgentsCause of DeathChi-Square DistributionComparative Effectiveness ResearchFemaleHumansHypertensionKaplan-Meier EstimateKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMedicaidMedicareAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsComparative effectivenessDialysisEnd stage renal diseaseHypertensionMortalityβ-blockers

Identifiers

PMID27012911
PMCPMC4807583
OpenAlexW2305945379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.