Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27012774›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology2016

Effect of nasal noninvasive respiratory support methods on pharyngeal provocation-induced aerodigestive reflexes in infants.

Sudarshan R Jadcherla, Kathryn A Hasenstab, Swetha Sitaram, Brian J Clouse, Jonathan L Slaughter, Reza Shaker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sudarshan R JadcherlaThe Neonatal and Infant Feeding Disorders Program, Center for Perinatal Research, Nationwide Children's Hospital Research Institute, Columbus Ohio; The Neonatal Aerodigestive Pulmonary Program, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio; Divisions of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; and Sudarshan.Jadcherla@nationwidechildrens.org.
Kathryn A HasenstabThe Neonatal and Infant Feeding Disorders Program, Center for Perinatal Research, Nationwide Children's Hospital Research Institute, Columbus Ohio; The Neonatal Aerodigestive Pulmonary Program, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio;
Swetha SitaramThe Neonatal and Infant Feeding Disorders Program, Center for Perinatal Research, Nationwide Children's Hospital Research Institute, Columbus Ohio;
Brian J ClouseThe Neonatal Aerodigestive Pulmonary Program, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio;
Jonathan L SlaughterDivisions of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics; The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, Ohio; and.
Reza ShakerGastroenterology and Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · US

Funding

The Physiology of the Pharyngo-Esophageal JunctionP01DK068051 · NIDDK · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2007 to 2018
$11.6M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK068051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharynx is a locus of provocation among infants with aerodigestive morbidities manifesting as dysphagia, life-threatening events, aspiration-pneumonia, atelectasis, and reflux, and such infants often receive nasal respiratory support. We determined the impact of different oxygen delivery methods on pharyngeal stimulation-induced aerodigestive reflexes [room air (RA), nasal cannula (NC), and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP)] while hypothesizing that the sensory motor characteristics of putative reflexes are distinct. Thirty eight infants (28.0 ± 0.7 wk gestation) underwent pharyngoesophageal manometry and respiratory inductance plethysmography to determine the effects of graded pharyngeal stimuli (n = 271) on upper and lower esophageal sphincters (UES, LES), swallowing, and deglutition-apnea. Comparisons were made between NC (n = 19), nCPAP (n = 9), and RA (n = 10) groups. Importantly, NC or nCPAP (vs. RA) had: 1) delayed feeding milestones (P < 0.05), 2) increased pharyngeal waveform recruitment and duration, greater UES nadir pressure, decreased esophageal contraction duration, decreased distal esophageal contraction amplitude, and decreased completely propagated esophageal peristalsis (all P < 0.05), and 3) similarly developed UES contractile and LES relaxation reflexes (P > 0.05). We conclude that aerodigestive reflexes were similarly developed in infants using noninvasive respiratory support with adequate upper and lower aerodigestive protection. Increased concern for GERD is unfounded in this population. These infants may benefit from targeted oromotor feeding therapies and safe pharyngeal bolus transit to accelerate feeding milestones.

Indexed as

ReflexCase-Control StudiesDeglutitionEsophagusFemaleHumansInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornMaleNoninvasive VentilationPeristalsisPharynxPlethysmographyRespirationbronchopulmonary dysplasia, neonate

Identifiers

PMID27012774
PMCPMC4935482
OpenAlexW2308772726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.