Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27012612›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2017

Cerebellar contribution to higher and lower order rule learning and cognitive flexibility in mice.

P E Dickson, J Cairns, D Goldowitz, G Mittleman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The cerebellum and cognitive neural networks.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Social Deficits and Cerebellar Degeneration in Purkinje CellFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

P E DicksonThe Jackson Laboratory, 600 Main Street, Bar Harbor, ME 04609, United States.
J CairnsCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
D GoldowitzCentre for Molecular Medicine and Therapeutics, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
G MittlemanDepartment of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, United States. Electronic address: gmittleman@bsu.edu.
University of British Columbia · CAJackson Laboratory · USUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

Cerebellar Modulation of Frontal Cortical FunctionR01NS063009 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI BLAHA, CHARLES, GOLDOWITZ, DANIEL · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS063009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive flexibility has traditionally been considered a frontal lobe function. However, converging evidence suggests involvement of a larger brain circuit which includes the cerebellum. Reciprocal pathways connecting the cerebellum to the prefrontal cortex provide a biological substrate through which the cerebellum may modulate higher cognitive functions, and it has been observed that cognitive inflexibility and cerebellar pathology co-occur in psychiatric disorders (e.g., autism, schizophrenia, addiction). However, the degree to which the cerebellum contributes to distinct forms of cognitive flexibility and rule learning is unknown. We tested lurcher↔wildtype aggregation chimeras which lose 0-100% of cerebellar Purkinje cells during development on a touchscreen-mediated attentional set-shifting task to assess the contribution of the cerebellum to higher and lower order rule learning and cognitive flexibility. Purkinje cells, the sole output of the cerebellar cortex, ranged from 0 to 108,390 in tested mice. Reversal learning and extradimensional set-shifting were impaired in mice with⩾95% Purkinje cell loss. Cognitive deficits were unrelated to motor deficits in ataxic mice. Acquisition of a simple visual discrimination and an attentional-set were unrelated to Purkinje cells. A positive relationship was observed between Purkinje cells and errors when exemplars from a novel, non-relevant dimension were introduced. Collectively, these data suggest that the cerebellum contributes to higher order cognitive flexibility, lower order cognitive flexibility, and attention to novel stimuli, but not the acquisition of higher and lower order rules. These data indicate that the cerebellar pathology observed in psychiatric disorders may underlie deficits involving cognitive flexibility and attention to novel stimuli.

Indexed as

Analysis of VarianceAnimalsAtaxiaAttentionCerebellumChimeraCognitionCognition DisordersExecutive FunctionMice, Neurologic MutantsNeuropsychological TestsReaction TimeReversal LearningRewardautismcerebellumchimeraexecutive functionreversal learningset-shifting

Identifiers

PMID27012612
PMCPMC5031514
OpenAlexW2308319082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.