Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27012563›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2016

E-cigarette vapour is not inert and exposure can lead to cell damage.

Richard Holliday, Ralf Kist, Linda Bauld

Abstract readComment
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Influence of Electronic Cigarettes on Selected Physicochemical Properties of Saliva.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Influence of Electronic Cigarettes on Selected Antibacterial Properties of Saliva.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Electronic cigarettes: One size does not fit all.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard HollidayCentre for Oral Health Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ralf KistCentre for Oral Health Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Linda BauldInstitute of Social Marketing, University of Stirling, Sterling, Scotland.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Stirling · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15192Cancer Research UK 20456Department of Health DRF-2015-08-077
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MATERIALS AND

methodsIn vitro experiments were performed on normal epithelial cells as well as head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) cell lines. The widely available cell line HaCat, a spontaneously transformed immortal keratinocyte and the HNSCC cell lines HN30 and UMSCC10B were used. Cells were exposed to nicotine-containing and nicotine-free vapour extract from two popular e-cigarette brands for periods ranging from 48 hours to eight weeks. Cytotoxicity was assessed using Annexin V flow cytometric analysis, trypan blue exclusion and clonogenic assays. Genotoxicity in the form of DNA strand breaks was quantified using the neutral comet assay and γ-H2AX immunostaining.

resultsE-cigarette-exposed cells showed significantly reduced cell viability and clonogenic survival, along with increased rates of apoptosis and necrosis, regardless of e-cigarette vapour nicotine content. They also exhibited significantly increased comet tail length and accumulation of γ-H2AX foci, demonstrating increased DNA strand breaks.

conclusionsIn conclusion, our study strongly suggests that electronic cigarettes are not as safe as their marketing makes them appear to the public. Our in vitro experiments employing two brands of e-cigs show that at biologically relevant doses, vapourised e-cig liquids induce increased DNA strand breaks and cell death, and decreased clono- genic survival in both normal epithelial and HNSCC cell lines independently of nicotine content. Further research is needed to definitively determine the long-term effects of e-cig usage, as well as whether the DNA damage shown in our study as a result of e-cig exposure will lead to mutations that ultimately result in cancer.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsNicotineComet AssayDNA DamageHumansTobacco ProductsNicotine

Identifiers

PMID27012563
OpenAlexW2313064562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.