Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27012555›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2016

Brain parenchymal damage in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder - A multimodal MRI study.

F Pache, H Zimmermann, C Finke, A Lacheta, S Papazoglou, J Kuchling, J Wuerfel, B Hamm, K Ruprecht, F Paul and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Retinal Optical Coherence Tomography in Neuromyelitis Optica.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Cortical topological network changes following optic neuritis.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2020
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Quantitative 7T MRI does not detect occult brain damage in neuromyelitis optica.Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2019
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F PacheNeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. florence.pache@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-0664
H ZimmermannNeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
C FinkeDepartment of Neurology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
A LachetaNeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
S PapazoglouNeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
J KuchlingNeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
J WuerfelNeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
B HammDepartment of Radiology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
K RuprechtDepartment of Neurology, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
F PaulNeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
A U BrandtNeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
M ScheelNeuroCure Clinical Research Center and Experimental and Clinical Research Center, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine and Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Max Delbrück Center · DECharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate different brain regions for grey (GM) and white matter (WM) damage in a well-defined cohort of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients and compare advanced MRI techniques (VBM, Subcortical and cortical analyses (Freesurfer), and DTI) for their ability to detect damage in NMOSD.

methodsWe analyzed 21 NMOSD patients and 21 age and gender matched control subjects. VBM (GW/WM) and DTI whole brain (TBSS) analyses were performed at different statistical thresholds to reflect different statistical approaches in previous studies. In an automated atlas-based approach, Freesurfer and DTI results were compared between NMOSD and controls.

resultsDTI TBSS and DTI atlas based analysis demonstrated microstructural impairment only within the optic radiation or in regions associated with the optic radiation (posterior thalamic radiation p < 0.001, 6.9 % reduction of fractional anisotropy). VBM demonstrated widespread brain GM and WM reduction, but only at exploratory statistical thresholds, with no differences remaining after correction for multiple comparisons. Freesurfer analysis demonstrated no group differences.

conclusionNMOSD specific parenchymal brain damage is predominantly located in the optic radiation, likely due to a secondary degeneration caused by ON. In comparison, DTI appears to be the most reliable and sensitive technique for brain damage detection in NMOSD. KEY POINTS: • The hypothesis of a widespread brain damage in NMOSD is challenged. • The optic radiation (OR) is the most severely affected region. • OR-affection is likely due to secondary degeneration following optic neuritis. • DTI is currently the most sensitive technique for NMOSD-related brain-damage detection. • DTI is currently the most reliable technique for NMOSD-related brain-damage detection.

Indexed as

AdultAnisotropyBrainCase-Control StudiesDiffusion Tensor ImagingFemaleGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNeuromyelitis OpticaOptic NerveTomography, Optical CoherenceWhite MatterDemyelinationDiffusion tensor ImagingNeuromyelitis optica spectrum disorderOptical coherence tomographyVBM analysis

Identifiers

PMID27012555
OpenAlexW2311383913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.