ReviewNeuroImage2017
Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls.
Review in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 404 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
404 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Identification of a diagnosis-selective neurobiological substrate for bipolar disorder, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia: a meta-analysis of 57,717 subjects.Psychological medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Magnetic resonance imaging-based machine learning classification of schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2024Pooled it
- Multivariate brain-behaviour associations in psychiatric disorders.Translational psychiatry · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluation of Risk of Bias in Neuroimaging-Based Artificial Intelligence Models for Psychiatric Diagnosis: A Systematic Review.JAMA network open · 2023Pooled it
- Clinical prediction models in psychiatry: a systematic review of two decades of progress and challenges.Molecular psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- rs-fMRI and machine learning for ASD diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- Machine learning methods for predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease dementia: a systematic review.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Brain structural connectomic topology predicts medication response in youth with bipolar disorder: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of affective disorders · 2025Trial
- Prediction of individual weight loss using supervised learning: findings from the CALERIEThe American journal of clinical nutrition · 2024Trial
- Machine learning classification of schizophrenia patients and healthy controls using diverse neuroanatomical markers and Ensemble methods.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Electroencephalography research in neuropathic pain (Review).Molecular medicine reports · 2026Review
- Brain Connectivity and Machine Learning Approaches to assess the underlying neurobiology and prediction accuracy of anorexia nervosa: A replication study.Psychiatry research. Neuroimaging · 2026Article
- From voxels to models: a multi-center voxel-based morphometry study identifying robust biomarkers for deep learning classification of schizophrenia.Brain imaging and behavior · 2026Article
- Imaging biomarkers in functional neurological disorders.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2026Review
- Leveraging pretrained vision transformers for classifying alcohol use disorder using raw resting-state EEG.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Classifying schizophrenia patients and healthy individuals: Whole brain SPECT functional connectivity using support vector machine classification.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Neural network-enhanced investigation of ferroptosis and druggability in early-onset alzheimer's disease.Metabolic brain disease · 2026Article
- Single-subject detection of speech network activation using functional near-infrared spectroscopy.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Multimodal phenotypic classification of generalized anxiety and panic using structural MRI data and psychosocial factors: machine learning results from the German National Cohort (NAKO) study.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
344 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuroimaging-based single subject prediction of brain disorders has gained increasing attention in recent years. Using a variety of neuroimaging modalities such as structural, functional and diffusion MRI, along with machine learning techniques, hundreds of studies have been carried out for accurate classification of patients with heterogeneous mental and neurodegenerative disorders such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer's disease. More than 500 studies have been published during the past quarter century on single subject prediction focused on a multiple brain disorders. In the first part of this study, we provide a survey of more than 200 reports in this field with a focus on schizophrenia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer's disease (AD), depressive disorders, autism spectrum disease (ASD) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Detailed information about those studies such as sample size, type and number of extracted features and reported accuracy are summarized and discussed. To our knowledge, this is by far the most comprehensive review of neuroimaging-based single subject prediction of brain disorders. In the second part, we present our opinion on major pitfalls of those studies from a machine learning point of view. Common biases are discussed and suggestions are provided. Moreover, emerging trends such as decentralized data sharing, multimodal brain imaging, differential diagnosis, disease subtype classification and deep learning are also discussed. Based on this survey, there is extensive evidence showing the great potential of neuroimaging data for single subject prediction of various disorders. However, the main bottleneck of this exciting field is still the limited sample size, which could be potentially addressed by modern data sharing models such as the ones discussed in this paper. Emerging big data technologies and advanced data-intensive machine learning methodologies such as deep learning have coincided with an increasing need for accurate, robust and generalizable single subject prediction of brain disorders during an exciting time. In this report, we survey the past and offer some opinions regarding the road ahead.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.