Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27012245›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2016

Simulation based virtual learning environment in medical genetics counseling: an example of bridging the gap between theory and practice in medical education.

Guido Makransky, Mads T Bonde, Julie S G Wulff, Jakob Wandall, Michelle Hood, Peter A Creed, Iben Bache, Asli Silahtaroglu, Anne Nørremølle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Characteristics and evaluation outcomes of genomics curricula for health professional students: a systematic literature review.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Guido MakranskyDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. gmakransky@health.sdu.dk.
Mads T BondeFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Julie S G WulffDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Jakob WandallDepartment of Education, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
Michelle HoodSchool of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Peter A CreedSchool of Applied Psychology and Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia.
Iben BacheDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Asli SilahtarogluDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne NørremølleDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKGriffith University · AUUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKAarhus University · DKRigshospitalet · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSimulation based learning environments are designed to improve the quality of medical education by allowing students to interact with patients, diagnostic laboratory procedures, and patient data in a virtual environment. However, few studies have evaluated whether simulation based learning environments increase students' knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy, and help them generalize from laboratory analyses to clinical practice and health decision-making.

methodsAn entire class of 300 University of Copenhagen first-year undergraduate students, most with a major in medicine, received a 2-h training session in a simulation based learning environment. The main outcomes were pre- to post- changes in knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy, together with post-intervention evaluation of the effect of the simulation on student understanding of everyday clinical practice were demonstrated.

resultsKnowledge (Cohen's d = 0.73), intrinsic motivation (d = 0.24), and self-efficacy (d = 0.46) significantly increased from the pre- to post-test. Low knowledge students showed the greatest increases in knowledge (d = 3.35) and self-efficacy (d = 0.61), but a non-significant increase in intrinsic motivation (d = 0.22). The medium and high knowledge students showed significant increases in knowledge (d = 1.45 and 0.36, respectively), motivation (d = 0.22 and 0.31), and self-efficacy (d = 0.36 and 0.52, respectively). Additionally, 90 % of students reported a greater understanding of medical genetics, 82 % thought that medical genetics was more interesting, 93 % indicated that they were more interested and motivated, and had gained confidence by having experienced working on a case story that resembled the real working situation of a doctor, and 78 % indicated that they would feel more confident counseling a patient after the simulation.

conclusionsThe simulation based learning environment increased students' learning, intrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy (although the strength of these effects differed depending on their pre-test knowledge), and increased the perceived relevance of medical educational activities. The results suggest that simulations can help future generations of doctors transfer new understanding of disease mechanisms gained in virtual laboratory settings into everyday clinical practice.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingUser-Computer InterfaceCurriculumEducational MeasurementFemaleGenetics, MedicalHumansMaleMotivationSelf EfficacyStudents, MedicalCytogeneticsE-LearningLearning simulationsMedical genetics educationVirtual laboratory

Identifiers

PMID27012245
PMCPMC4807545
OpenAlexW2311619001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.