ReviewNorth American journal of medical sciences2016
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Lesions: A Systematic Review of Technical and Procedural Variables.
Review in North American journal of medical sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Capillarity Versus Wet Technique. Comparison Between Two Methods of Tissue Acquisition Guided by Endoscopic Ultrasound.
The Accurateness of Endoscopic Ultrasound Elastography in the Guidance of EUS-FNA in Solid Pancreatic Lesions
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A comparison of the efficiency of 22G versus 25G needles in EUS-FNA for solid pancreatic mass assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2018Pooled it
- Magnetic resonance imaging radiomics-based machine learning model for preoperative prediction of pathological grade in pancreatic cancer: A preliminary study.European journal of radiology open · 2025Article
- Point-of-Care Testing and Biomarkers in Biliary Diseases: Current Evidence and Future Directions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and local ablative therapy of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2025Review
- Fatty infiltration of the pancreas: a systematic concept analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Review
- Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Aspiration versus Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- EUS-FNA and ROSE in solid lesions of the pancreas; have the same diagnostic efficacy compared to pancreatic sites?Northern clinics of Istanbul · 2022Article
- Factors Responsible for Non-Diagnostic Cytology on Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Thyroid Nodules.Cureus · 2021Article
- Preoperative prediction of pathological grade in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma based onEJNMMI research · 2021Article
- Feasibility and safety study of 22-gauge endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) needles for portal vein sampling in a swine model.Endoscopy international open · 2020Article
- Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) with Image Enhancement.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of Newly Designed 21-Gauge and Standard 22-Gauge Aspiration Needles in Patients with Solid Pancreatic Masses.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2019Article
- Recent advancement in EUS-guided fine needle sampling.Journal of gastroenterology · 2019Review
- How to measure quality in endoscopic ultrasound.Annals of translational medicine · 2018Review
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic lesions with 22 versus 25 Gauge needles: A meta-analysis.United European gastroenterology journal · 2017Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided techniques for diagnosing pancreatic mass lesions: Can we do better?World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Review
- The Role of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Lesions.North American journal of medical sciences · 2016Article
- Resectable pancreatic solid lesions: Time to move from surgical diagnosis?Endoscopic ultrasoundReview
- Comparison between 22G aspiration and 22G biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions: A meta-analysis.Endoscopic ultrasoundReview
- Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions guided by endoscopic ultrasound elastography.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition has emerged over the last decade as an invaluable diagnostic tool in approaching the different pancreatic lesions. Given the safety and minimal invasiveness of this approach combined with the high diagnostic yield, it became the standard of care when dealing with different pancreatic pathologies. However, some variables regarding this procedure remain not fully understood. These can influence the diagnostic yield of the procedure and include the presence of the on-site cytopathologist, the type and size of the needle used as well as obtaining aspiration versus core biopsy, the number of passes and the sampling technique, and the role of suction and stylet use among others. We performed a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase for studies that assessed these variables. Eligible studies were analyzed using several parameters such as technique and procedure, with the aim of reviewing results from an evidence-based standpoint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.