Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27011761›Full record

ArticleHarmful algae2015

Harmful algal blooms and climate change: Learning from the past and present to forecast the future.

Mark L Wells, Vera L Trainer, Theodore J Smayda, Bengt S O Karlson, Charles G Trick, Raphael M Kudela, Akira Ishikawa, Stewart Bernard, Angela Wulff, Donald M Anderson and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Harmful algae, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
43.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 769 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ecological Effects ofBiology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Mark L WellsSchool of Marine Sciences, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA.
Vera L TrainerMarine Biotoxins Program, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 2725 Montlake Blvd. E., Seattle, WA 98112, USA.
Theodore J SmaydaGraduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI 02881, USA.
Bengt S O KarlsonSMHI Research & Development, Oceanography, Sven Källfelts gata 15, 426 71 Västra Frölunda, Sweden.
Charles G TrickDepartment of Biology, Western University, London, ON, Canada N6A 5B7.
Raphael M KudelaOcean Sciences, University of California Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
Akira IshikawaLaboratory of Biological Oceanography, Graduate School of Bioresources, Mie University, 1577 Kurima-machiya-cho, Tsu-shi, Mie-ken 514-8507, Japan.
Stewart BernardEarth Systems Earth Observation, CSIR-NRE Centre for High Performance Computing, 15 Lower Hope Street, Rosebank, Cape Town 7700, South Africa.
Angela WulffDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, SE405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.
Donald M AndersonWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA.
William P CochlanRomberg Tiburon Center for Environmental Studies, San Francisco State University, 3152 Paradise Drive, Tiburon, CA 94920-1205, USA.
Centre for High Performance Computing · ZAMie University · JPNOAA National Marine Fisheries Service Northwest Fisheries Science Center · USSan Francisco State University · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of Gothenburg · SEUniversity of Maine · USUniversity of Rhode Island · USWestern University · CAWoods Hole Oceanographic Institution · US

Funding

WHCOHH: Harmful algal bloom dynamics and epigenetic mechanism of toxin actionP01ES021923 · NIEHS · WOODS HOLE OCEANOGRAPHIC INSTITUTION · PI STEGEMAN, JOHN J · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS P01 ES021923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Climate change pressures will influence marine planktonic systems globally, and it is conceivable that harmful algal blooms may increase in frequency and severity. These pressures will be manifest as alterations in temperature, stratification, light, ocean acidification, precipitation-induced nutrient inputs, and grazing, but absence of fundamental knowledge of the mechanisms driving harmful algal blooms frustrates most hope of forecasting their future prevalence. Summarized here is the consensus of a recent workshop held to address what currently is known and not known about the environmental conditions that favor initiation and maintenance of harmful algal blooms. There is expectation that harmful algal bloom (HAB) geographical domains should expand in some cases, as will seasonal windows of opportunity for harmful algal blooms at higher latitudes. Nonetheless there is only basic information to speculate upon which regions or habitats HAB species may be the most resilient or susceptible. Moreover, current research strategies are not well suited to inform these fundamental linkages. There is a critical absence of tenable hypotheses for how climate pressures mechanistically affect HAB species, and the lack of uniform experimental protocols limits the quantitative cross-investigation comparisons essential to advancement. A HAB "best practices" manual would help foster more uniform research strategies and protocols, and selection of a small target list of model HAB species or isolates for study would greatly promote the accumulation of knowledge. Despite the need to focus on keystone species, more studies need to address strain variability within species, their responses under multifactorial conditions, and the retrospective analyses of long-term plankton and cyst core data; research topics that are departures from the norm. Examples of some fundamental unknowns include how larger and more frequent extreme weather events may break down natural biogeographic barriers, how stratification may enhance or diminish HAB events, how trace nutrients (metals, vitamins) influence cell toxicity, and how grazing pressures may leverage, or mitigate HAB development. There is an absence of high quality time-series data in most regions currently experiencing HAB outbreaks, and little if any data from regions expected to develop HAB events in the future. A subset of observer sites is recommended to help develop stronger linkages among global, national, and regional climate change and HAB observation programs, providing fundamental datasets for investigating global changes in the prevalence of harmful algal blooms. Forecasting changes in HAB patterns over the next few decades will depend critically upon considering harmful algal blooms within the competitive context of plankton communities, and linking these insights to ecosystem, oceanographic and climate models. From a broader perspective, the nexus of HAB science and the social sciences of harmful algal blooms is inadequate and prevents quantitative assessment of impacts of future HAB changes on human well-being. These and other fundamental changes in HAB research will be necessary if HAB science is to obtain compelling evidence that climate change has caused alterations in HAB distributions, prevalence or character, and to develop the theoretical, experimental, and empirical evidence explaining the mechanisms underpinning these ecological shifts.

Indexed as

Climate changeHABHarmful algal blooms

Identifiers

PMID27011761
PMCPMC4800334
OpenAlexW2195352021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.