Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27011555›Full record

ReviewThe Indian journal of surgery2015

Clinical Outcome Following Hemorrhoid Surgery: a Narrative Review.

Marcello Picchio, Ettore Greco, Annalisa Di Filippo, Giuseppe Marino, Francesco Stipa, Erasmo Spaziani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Indian journal of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marcello PicchioDepartment of Surgery, Civil Hospital "P. Colombo", Via Orti Ginnetti 7, 00049 Velletri Rome, Italy ; Via Giulio Cesare, n. 58, 04100 Latina, Italy.
Ettore GrecoDepartment of Surgery, Civil Hospital "P. Colombo", Via Orti Ginnetti 7, 00049 Velletri Rome, Italy.
Annalisa Di FilippoDepartment of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Polo Pontino Via Firenze, s.n.c., 04019 Terracina Latina, Italy.
Giuseppe MarinoDepartment of Surgery, Civil Hospital "P. Colombo", Via Orti Ginnetti 7, 00049 Velletri Rome, Italy.
Francesco StipaDepartment of Surgery, Hospital "S. Giovanni-Addolorata", Via dell'Amba Aradam 9, 00184 Rome, Italy.
Erasmo SpazianiDepartment of Surgery, Sapienza University of Rome, Polo Pontino Via Firenze, s.n.c., 04019 Terracina Latina, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical therapy guaranties satisfactory results, which are significantly better than those obtained with conservative therapies, especially for Grade III and IV hemorrhoids. In this review, we present and discuss the results of the most diffuse surgical techniques for hemorrhoids. Traditional surgery for hemorrhoids aims to remove the hemorrhoids, with closure (Fergusson's technique) or without closure (Milligan-Morgan procedure) of the ensuing defect. This traditional approach is effective, but causes a significant postoperative pain because of wide external wounds in the innervated perianal skin. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy, proposed by Longo, has gained a vast acceptance because of less postoperative pain and faster return to normal activities. In the recent literature, a significant incidence of recurrence after stapled hemorrhoidopexy was reported, when compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy. Double stapler hemorrhoidopexy may be an alternative to simple stapled hemorrhoidopexy to reduce the recurrence in advanced hemorrhoidal prolapse. Transanal hemorrhoidal deartertialization was showed to be as effective as stapled hemorrhoidopexy in terms of treatment success, complications, and incidence recurrence. However, further high-quality trials are recommended to assess the efficacy and safety of this technique.

Indexed as

HemorrhoidsIndicationResectionStaplerSurgery

Identifiers

PMID27011555
PMCPMC4775648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.