Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27011524›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of surgery2015

Ostomy Closures in Children: Variations in Perioperative Care Do Not Change the Outcome.

Yusuf Hakan Çavuşoğlu, Ayşe Karaman, Çağatay Evrim Afşarlar, İbrahim Karaman, Derya Erdoğan, İsmet Faruk Özgüner

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of surgery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06902116 (Comparison of Outcome of Three Days Bowel Preparation vs No Bowel Preparation in Patients of Colostomy Reversal), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06902116 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of Outcome of Three Days Bowel Preparation vs No Bowel Preparation in Patients of Colostomy Reversal

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Child Health Sciences and Children's Hospital, LahoreRan2025 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsColostomy - Stoma, Bowel Preparation, BOWEL ANASTOMOSISArmsNo Mechanical Bowel Preparation, Mechanical Bowel Preparation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yusuf Hakan ÇavuşoğluDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Dr. Sami Ulus Maternity and Children's Hospital, 06080 Altındağ, Ankara Turkey.
Ayşe KaramanDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Dr. Sami Ulus Maternity and Children's Hospital, 06080 Altındağ, Ankara Turkey.
Çağatay Evrim AfşarlarDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Dr. Sami Ulus Maternity and Children's Hospital, 06080 Altındağ, Ankara Turkey.
İbrahim KaramanDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Dr. Sami Ulus Maternity and Children's Hospital, 06080 Altındağ, Ankara Turkey.
Derya ErdoğanDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Dr. Sami Ulus Maternity and Children's Hospital, 06080 Altındağ, Ankara Turkey.
İsmet Faruk ÖzgünerDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Dr. Sami Ulus Maternity and Children's Hospital, 06080 Altındağ, Ankara Turkey.
Boston Children's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate ostomy closure applications and outcomes and determine the effect of personal differences among surgeons on patient postoperative course. Ninety-eight patients who underwent elective ostomy (ileostomy and colostomy) closure for 8 years at a pediatric surgery training department were investigated. Postoperative complications included superficial surgical site infection (SSI; 9.4 %), organ/cavity infection (1 %), small bowel adhesions (8.2 %), and incisional hernia (1 %). SSI and postoperative complications were not affected by the preoperative antibiotic regimen used. Operation duration, pre- and postoperative antibiotic use durations, postoperative inpatient period, ostomy type, primary diagnosis, performance of abdominal exploration, SSI, and postoperative complications were not significantly different. However, the time of nasogastric (NG) tube withdrawal, time to oral feeding initiation, abdominal closure method used, and preoperative antibiotic regimen were significantly different among different surgeons. We conclude that while surgeons used different preoperative antibiotic regimens and abdominal closure methods and stipulated different times for NG tube withdrawal and oral feeding initiation, the postoperative course and prognosis were unaffected Thus, the pre- and postoperative inpatient period and antibiotic use duration can be decreased in children by procedure standardization using practice guidelines; the procedures can also be performed with a more aesthetic, acceptable incision.

Indexed as

AnastomosisAntibiotic prophylaxisColorectal surgeryOstomySurgicalSurgical wound infectionTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID27011524
PMCPMC4775680
OpenAlexW2077119740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.