ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2016
Should maximal urethral closure pressure be performed before midurethral sling surgery for stress incontinence? A time to revisit.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of intrinsic sphincter deficiency on treatment success following urethral bulking with polyacrylamide hydrogel.Investigative and clinical urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisMaximum urethral closure pressure (MUCP) provides an objective assessment of urethral integrity, but its role in predicting outcome after midurethral sling (MUS) placement is debatable and current practice in the UK is variable. The study was carried out to determine if lower preoperative MUCP is associated with poor outcome following MUS.
methodThe study was a retrospective review of the British Society of Urogynaecology (BSUG) database and urodynamics (UDS) data. Patients who reported outcome as "no improvement", "worse" or "much worse" on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGII) scale were identified as having a poor outcome. Patients who reported "a little improvement", "improved" and "very much improved" on the PGII were thought to have a good outcome. The preoperative demographics, UDS findings and quality of life (International Consultation of Incontinence questionnaires [ICIQ-SF]) data of the two groups were compared.
resultA total of 236 women were identified for the study. Of these, 24 women (10.2 %) had a poor outcome. Of the remaining women reporting a good outcome, 50 cases were randomly selected. All urodynamic parameters, including mean functional urethral length (FUL), bladder capacity, and Qmax, were similar, except for mean MUCP 37.05 cm H2O, which was significantly lower in group 1 (poor outcome 37.05 cm H2O) compared with a mean MUCP of 50.6 cm H2O in group 2 (good outcome; p = 0.005).
conclusionWe conclude that failure following MUS is associated with preoperatively lower MUCP, which can be used as a predictor of failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27010558What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.