Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27010190›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on biological therapy2016

Considerations for the combination of anticancer vaccines and immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Julius Strauss, Ravi A Madan, James L Gulley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on biological therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Phase I Trial of M7824 (MSB0011359C), a Bifunctional Fusion Protein Targeting PD-L1 and TGFβ, in Advanced Solid Tumors.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  14. Prostate cancer immunotherapy: the path forward.Current opinion in supportive and palliative care · 2017
    Review
  15. Resistance to anticancer immunity in cancer patients: potential strategies to reverse resistance.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julius Straussa Genitourinary Malignancies Branch , Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute , Bethesda , MD , USA.
Ravi A Madana Genitourinary Malignancies Branch , Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute , Bethesda , MD , USA.
James L Gulleya Genitourinary Malignancies Branch , Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute , Bethesda , MD , USA.

Funding

Clinical trials employing cancer vaccine combination therapiesZIABC010945 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GULLEY, JAMES L. · 2009 to 2022
$9.6M
Cancer Immunotherapy Clinical TrialsZIABC011547 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI STRAUSS, JULIUS · 2014 to 2023
$8.1M
Clinical trials employing cancer vaccine combination therapiesZ01BC010945 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI GULLEY, JAMES L. · 2008 to 2008
$517k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOver the past few years, trials evaluating immunotherapies, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors, have revolutionized the standard model of cancer treatment, demonstrating significant antitumor responses and improved clinical outcomes across a wide array of tumors types. Yet, despite these compelling data, a major limitation has been that only a fraction of patients mount a response to single-agent immune checkpoint inhibition. However, a growing amount of preclinical and clinical data suggests that combining immune checkpoint inhibition, either with other immune checkpoint inhibitors or with therapeutic cancer vaccines, has the potential to improve the proportion of patients seeing long-term durable responses with these therapies. AREAS COVERED: We have reviewed the reported data on immune checkpoint inhibition as monotherapy and as combination therapy with other immune checkpoint inhibitors or therapeutic cancer vaccines. Data is reviewed on agents with FDA approval or breakthrough designation as of the writing of this manuscript. EXPERT OPINION: Particular focus is given to the combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and therapeutic cancer vaccines which has the potential to increase efficacy compared to single agent immune checkpoint inhibition with minimal added toxicity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalCancer VaccinesCombined Modality TherapyGenes, cdcHumansImmunotherapyNeoplasmsAntibodies, MonoclonalCancer VaccinesImmune checkpoint inhibitorsimmunogenic intensificationtherapeutic cancer vaccines

Identifiers

PMID27010190
PMCPMC6599515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.