Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27009864›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Two classes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma defined by relative abundance of mutations and copy number alterations.

Young-Ho Kim, Eun-Kyung Hong, Sun-Young Kong, Sung-Sik Han, Seoung-Hoon Kim, Je-Keun Rhee, Soo-Kyung Hwang, Sang-Jae Park, Tae-Min Kim

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Young-Ho KimTranslational Epidemiology Research Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Eun-Kyung HongCenter for Liver Cancer and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Sun-Young KongTranslational Epidemiology Research Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Sung-Sik HanCenter for Liver Cancer and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Seoung-Hoon KimCenter for Liver Cancer and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Je-Keun RheeDepartment of Medical Informatics, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo-Kyung HwangTranslational Epidemiology Research Branch, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Jae ParkCenter for Liver Cancer and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Republic of Korea.
Tae-Min KimDepartment of Medical Informatics, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
National Cancer Center · KRCatholic University of Korea · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is a biliary tree-origin epithelial malignancy in liver with unfavorable clinical outcomes. Systematic genome analyses may advance our understanding of ICC pathogenesis also improving current diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. In this study, we analyzed 17 ICC tumor-vs-matched normal pairs using either whole-exome (n = 7), transcriptome sequencing (n = 7) or both platforms (n = 3). For somatic mutations, we identified recurrent mutations of previously reported genes such as KRAS, TP53, APC as well as epigenetic regulators and those of TGFβ signaling pathway. According to the abundance of somatic mutations and DNA copy number alterations (CNA), ten ICC exome cases were distinguished into two classes as those primarily driven by either somatic mutations (M class) or CNAs (C class). Compared to M class ICCs (92-147 somatic mutations; n = 5) with a relative deficit of CNAs, C class ICCs (54-84 mutations; n = 5) harbor recurrent focal CNAs including deletions involving CDKN2A, ROBO1, ROBO2, RUNX3, and SMAD4. We also show that transcriptome sequencing can be used for expression-based ICC categorization but the somatic mutation calling from the transcriptome can be heavily influenced by the gene expression level and potentially, by posttranscriptional modification such as nonsense mediated decay. Along with a substantial level of mutational heterogeneity of ICC genomes, our study reveals previously unrecognized two ICC classes defined by relative abundance of somatic mutations over CNAs or vice versa, which should be considered in the selection of genotyping platforms and sensitive screening of targets for ICC therapeutics.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsMutationAgedBile Duct NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCholangiocarcinomaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateBiomarkers, Tumorcholangiocarcinomaexome sequencingsomatic mutationstranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID27009864
PMCPMC5029666
OpenAlexW2339813250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.