Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27009862›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2016

Virtual screening-driven repositioning of etoposide as CD44 antagonist in breast cancer cells.

Charmina Aguirre-Alvarado, Aldo Segura-Cabrera, Inés Velázquez-Quesada, Miguel A Hernández-Esquivel, Carlos A García-Pérez, Sandra L Guerrero-Rodríguez, Angel J Ruiz-Moreno, Andrea Rodríguez-Moreno, Sonia M Pérez-Tapia, Marco A Velasco-Velázquez

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. p53-Mediated PI3K/AKT/mTOR Pathway Played a Role in PtoxOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2019
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Charmina Aguirre-AlvaradoFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México D.F., México.
Aldo Segura-CabreraRed de Estudios Moleculares Avanzados, Instituto de Ecología (INECOL) A.C., Clúster Científico y Tecnológico Biomimic®, Xalapa, Veracruz, México.
Inés Velázquez-QuesadaUnidad de Desarrollo e Investigación en Bioprocesos, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas-IPN, México D.F., México.
Miguel A Hernández-EsquivelUnidad de Desarrollo e Investigación en Bioprocesos, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas-IPN, México D.F., México.
Carlos A García-PérezCentro de Biotecnología Genómica-IPN, Reynosa, Tamaulipas, México.
Sandra L Guerrero-RodríguezFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México D.F., México.
Angel J Ruiz-MorenoFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México D.F., México.
Andrea Rodríguez-MorenoFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México D.F., México.
Sonia M Pérez-TapiaUnidad de Desarrollo e Investigación en Bioprocesos, Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas-IPN, México D.F., México.
Marco A Velasco-VelázquezFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), México D.F., México.
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXInstituto Politécnico Nacional · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CD44 is a receptor for hyaluronan (HA) that promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), induces cancer stem cell (CSC) expansion, and favors metastasis. Thus, CD44 is a target for the development of antineoplastic agents. In order to repurpose drugs as CD44 antagonists, we performed consensus-docking studies using the HA-binding domain of CD44 and 11,421 molecules. Drugs that performed best in docking were examined in molecular dynamics simulations, identifying etoposide as a potential CD44 antagonist. Ligand competition and cell adhesion assays in MDA-MB-231 cells demonstrated that etoposide decreased cell binding to HA as effectively as a blocking antibody. Etoposide-treated MDA-MB-231 cells developed an epithelial morphology; increased their expression of E-cadherin; and reduced their levels of EMT-associated genes and cell migration. By gene expression analysis, etoposide reverted an EMT signature similarly to CD44 knockdown, whereas other topoisomerase II (TOP2) inhibitors did not. Moreover, etoposide decreased the proportion of CD44+/CD24- cells, lowered chemoresistance, and blocked mammosphere formation. Our data indicate that etoposide blocks CD44 activation, impairing key cellular functions that drive malignancy, thus rendering it a candidate for further translational studies and a potential lead compound in the development of new CD44 antagonists.

Indexed as

Drug RepositioningAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCD24 AntigenCell ProliferationEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionEtoposideFemaleHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsHyaluronic AcidMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenCD44 protein, humanEtoposideHyaluronan ReceptorsHyaluronic Acidbreast cancercancer stem cellsCD44epithelial-mesenchymal transitionetoposide

Identifiers

PMID27009862
PMCPMC5029662
OpenAlexW2342575417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.