Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27009765›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Reproducibility of radiomics for deciphering tumor phenotype with imaging.

Binsheng Zhao, Yongqiang Tan, Wei-Yann Tsai, Jing Qi, Chuanmiao Xie, Lin Lu, Lawrence H Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 310 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
310citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

310 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Automated Imaging as an Adjunct to Serum and Clinical Biomarkers: A New Validated Prediction Tool for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Trial
  6. Radiomics model for preoperative prediction of 3-year survival-based CT image biomarkers in esophageal cancer.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2022
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

250 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Binsheng ZhaoDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York NY 10032, USA.
Yongqiang TanDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York NY 10032, USA.
Wei-Yann TsaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Columbia University Medical Center, 722 West 168th Street, New York NY 10032, USA.
Jing QiDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York NY 10032, USA.
Chuanmiao XieDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York NY 10032, USA.
Lin LuDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York NY 10032, USA.
Lawrence H SchwartzDepartment of Radiology, Columbia University Medical Center, 710 West 168th Street, New York NY 10032, USA.

Funding

Studying measurement variability in tumor volume and volume change on MDCTR01CA149490 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ZHAO, BINSHENG · 2011 to 2016
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA149490
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiomics (radiogenomics) characterizes tumor phenotypes based on quantitative image features derived from routine radiologic imaging to improve cancer diagnosis, prognosis, prediction and response to therapy. Although radiomic features must be reproducible to qualify as biomarkers for clinical care, little is known about how routine imaging acquisition techniques/parameters affect reproducibility. To begin to fill this knowledge gap, we assessed the reproducibility of a comprehensive, commonly-used set of radiomic features using a unique, same-day repeat computed tomography data set from lung cancer patients. Each scan was reconstructed at 6 imaging settings, varying slice thicknesses (1.25 mm, 2.5 mm and 5 mm) and reconstruction algorithms (sharp, smooth). Reproducibility was assessed using the repeat scans reconstructed at identical imaging setting (6 settings in total). In separate analyses, we explored differences in radiomic features due to different imaging parameters by assessing the agreement of these radiomic features extracted from the repeat scans reconstructed at the same slice thickness but different algorithms (3 settings in total). Our data suggest that radiomic features are reproducible over a wide range of imaging settings. However, smooth and sharp reconstruction algorithms should not be used interchangeably. These findings will raise awareness of the importance of properly setting imaging acquisition parameters in radiomics/radiogenomics research.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsHumansLung NeoplasmsPhenotypeRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedReproducibility of ResultsTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID27009765
PMCPMC4806325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.