Observational studyCirculation. Heart failure2016
Heart Failure and Midrange Ejection Fraction: Implications of Recovered Ejection Fraction for Exercise Tolerance and Outcomes.
Observational study in Circulation. Heart failure, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence and Prognosis of HFimpEF Developed From Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Nutrition in chronic heart failure patients: a systematic review.Heart failure reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Characteristics and long-term prognosis of patients with heart failure and mid-range ejection fraction compared with reduced and preserved ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2018Pooled it
- Comparative Outcomes of Heart Failure with Preserved vs. Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Machine learning model for predicting improvement in left ventricular systolic function in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Clinical outcomes of heart failure with improved ejection fraction in patients treated with angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Article
- Characteristics, outcomes and the necessity of continued guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with heart failure with improved ejection fraction.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- [Clinical characteristics and pharmacological treatment of patients with heart failure in a primary health care cohort].Atencion primaria · 2025Article
- Left ventricular reverse remodeling: A predictor of survival in chagasic cardiomyopathy patients with a reduced ejection fraction.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Subclinical hypothyroidism: a new predictor of heart failure with improved ejection fraction in HFrEF patients.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Reverse Remodelling, Myocardial Recovery and Remission in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction: Clinical Implications and Management Strategies.Cardiac failure review · 2025Review
- Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: Prevalence, Predictors, and Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy.Cureus · 2024Review
- Your Heart Function Has Normalized-What Next After TRED-HF?Current heart failure reports · 2023Review
- Review
- Ejection fraction at hospital admission stratifies mortality risk in HFmrEF patients aged ≥ 70 years: a retrospective analysis from a tertiary university institution.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
- What have we learned so far from the sex/gender issue in heart failure? An overview of current evidence.Internal and emergency medicine · 2022Review
- Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction: retrospective study of ejection fraction trajectory risk.ESC heart failure · 2022Article
- β-blocker and 1-year outcomes among patients hospitalized for heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction.European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy · 2022Article
- Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction and the utility of defibrillator therapy: a review.ESC heart failure · 2022Review
- Pre-operative evaluation and mid-term outcomes of anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery based on left ventricular ejection fraction.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEvidence-based therapies for heart failure (HF) differ significantly according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, few data are available on the phenotype and prognosis of patients with HF with midrange LVEF of 40% to 55%, and the impact of recovered systolic function on the clinical features, functional capacity, and outcomes of this population is not known. METHODS AND
resultsWe studied 944 patients with HF who underwent clinically indicated cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The study population was categorized according to LVEF as follows: HF with reduced LVEF (HFrEF; LVEF<40%; n=620); HF with midrange ejection fraction and no recovered ejection fraction (LVEF was consistent between 40% and 55%; n=107); HF with recovered midrange ejection fraction (LVEF, 40%-55% but previous LVEF<40%; n=170); and HF with preserved LVEF (HFpEF; LVEF>55%; n=47). HF with midrange ejection fraction and no recovered ejection fraction and HF with recovered midrange ejection fraction had similar clinical characteristics, which were intermediate between those of HFrEF and HFpEF, and comparable values of predicted peak oxygen consumption and minute-ventilation/carbon dioxide production slope, which were better than HFrEF and similar to HFpEF. After a median of 4.4 (2.9-5.7) years, there were 253 composite events (death, left ventricular assistant device implantation, or transplantation). In multivariable Cox-regression analysis, HF with recovered midrange ejection fraction had lower risk of composite events than HFrEF (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.47) and HF with midrange ejection fraction and no recovered ejection fraction (hazard ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.67), and similar prognosis when compared with HFpEF. In contrast, HF with midrange ejection fraction and no recovered ejection fraction tended to show intermediate risk of outcomes in comparison with HFpEF and HFrEF, albeit not reaching statistical significance in fully adjusted analyses.
conclusionsPatients with HF with midrange LVEF demonstrate a distinct clinical profile from HFpEF and HFrEF patients, with objective measures of functional capacity similar to HFpEF. Within the midrange LVEF HF population, recovered systolic function is a marker of more favorable prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.