Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27009219›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Genetic variation in aggregation behaviour and interacting phenotypes in Drosophila.

Anne-Sophie Philippe, Raphael Jeanson, Cristian Pasquaretta, Francois Rebaudo, Cedric Sueur, Frederic Mery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Editorial: Recent Advances in Animal Cognition and Ethology.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. TheJournal of neurogenetics · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The DrosophilaCognitive development · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anne-Sophie PhilippeLaboratoire Evolution, Génomes, Comportement and Ecologie, CNRS, IRD, Université. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette 91198, France.
Raphael JeansonUniversité de Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, 118 Route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse Cedex 9, France.
Cristian PasquarettaDépartement Ecologie, Physiologie et Ethologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Strasbourg, France Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Francois RebaudoLaboratoire Evolution, Génomes, Comportement and Ecologie, CNRS, IRD, Université. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette 91198, France Instituto de Ecología, Centro de Análisis Espacial, Universidad Mayor de San Andrés, La Paz, Bolivia.
Cedric SueurDépartement Ecologie, Physiologie et Ethologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Strasbourg, France Institut Pluridisciplinaire Hubert Curien, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Frederic MeryLaboratoire Evolution, Génomes, Comportement and Ecologie, CNRS, IRD, Université. Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette 91198, France frederic.mery@egce.cnrs-gif.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aggregation behaviour is the tendency for animals to group together, which may have important consequences on individual fitness. We used a combination of experimental and simulation approaches to study how genetic variation and social environment interact to influence aggregation dynamics in Drosophila To do this, we used two different natural lines of Drosophila that arise from a polymorphism in the foraging gene (rovers and sitters). We placed groups of flies in a heated arena. Flies could freely move towards one of two small, cooler refuge areas. In groups of the same strain, sitters had a greater tendency to aggregate. The observed behavioural variation was based on only two parameters: the probability of entering a refuge and the likelihood of choosing a refuge based on the number of individuals present. We then directly addressed how different strains interact by mixing rovers and sitters within a group. Aggregation behaviour of each line was strongly affected by the presence of the other strain, without changing the decision rules used by each. Individuals obeying local rules shaped complex group dynamics via a constant feedback loop between the individual and the group. This study could help to identify the circumstances under which particular group compositions may improve individual fitness through underlying aggregation mechanisms under specific environmental conditions.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPhenotypeAnimalsDecision MakingDrosophila melanogasterFemaleModels, BiologicalSocial BehaviorSocial Environmentaggregation behaviourDrosophila melanogasterforaging geneinteracting phenotypessocial interaction

Identifiers

PMID27009219
PMCPMC4822458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.